[Longbow1969]

Which is exactly why I joined the Constitution Party. For the first time since Reagan left office, I'll be voting for a conservative candidate.

You keep pushing this Constitution Party without mentioning to people that they believe in a protectionist trade policy that the likes of Bernie Sanders (S-VT) would love, and an isolationist foreign policy that would make Ron Paul supporters giddy.

The Constitution Party is not a real alternative. They will get the same nothing burger percentage of the vote they always get.

[SoConPubbie]

The Constitution Party is not a real alternative. They will get the same nothing burger percentage of the vote they always get.

For some of us, it isn't about Party over Principle.

For some of us, it isn't just about winning, but about winning with someone of principle.

Mitt has no princples, None.

[ScottinVA]

The USCP opposes trade agreements which have the uneven plane that puts American manufacturers at a disadvantage.

As for the foreign policy issue of nonintervention, I’m not completely aligned with it, because history has shown there are instances in which preventive intervention is needed... but the party’s platform as a whole is one with which I mostly agree.

As for the USCP not being a real alternative... how much of an “alternative” is Mitt Romney offering these days?