Well E-S, you may have "found" it that way; but it certainly wasn't intended that way.
I do not "dismiss" you. I do not have a sarcastic bone in my body. And in what way was my reply "frivolous?"
I absolutely do not see in what way Romney's "agenda" is "similar" to Obama's. Frankly, demonizing him as "the committed Luciferian candidate" strikes me as 'way over the top.... Maybe it's even a red herring.
But maybe you can clue me in on all this. I'm willing to listen. Just see if you can do it without laying charges of freemasonry and Luciferian intent on his doorstep. That is only a conjecture at best — although clearly, it is a very passionately held one.
But that doesn't necessarily make it objectively true....
I'm just trying to be objective in analyzing our electoral prospects; and in the matter of third-party candidates, I'm just letting history be my guide.
>> “But that doesn’t necessarily make it objectively true” <<
.
Eyes wide shut!
Reality doesn’t go away just because you wish not to see it.
The forces that control this country (and the world) are at this point well understood to those that are willing to see, and a blank to the rest. They even confess in writing in their literature, yet some refuse to read.
You cannot take that position, and still lay claim to being any part of the solution.