Zullo is a retired police detective who has been deputized by Sheriff Joe. He is law enforcement.
Zullo spoke to the eyewitnesses. Unless a person was an eyewitness or there’s a tape recording, what Zullo has is the best evidence there is - particularly if corroborated by multiple eyewitnesses and by other evidence such as handwritten notes, signed letters, etc (which Hagman says he has).
Amazing, that eyewitness testimony is now not considered good enough evidence, but no evidence whatsoever is considered good enough by two ballot-challenge judges so far - in the sharia “judge’s knowledge” rulings.
Down is up and up is down...
Zullo was a policeman who became a private detective and then a used car salesman for the last 20 years. He was never a police detective.
If Zullo is bona-fide LEO that what the hell is he doing selling parts of his investigation before his investigation is complete?
If we ever see any eyewitness testimony, we can evaluate it. Do you have any?
Don’t waste your time documenting everything you say. I’ve seen it a million times before from liberal trolls — they try to exhaust you by continually asking for links, sources, and proof — all the while never backing up a single thing they say with the same. Ignore them and keep up the good work you’ve been doing. By now if someone doesn’t conclude that something’s terribly wrong, they simply don’t want to know.