I wish I had the links to back this up, but I’m sure you both are aware of the reports coming in from all sources that indicate one of the biggest concerns of women in forward positions is the huge numbers of them coming off deployment early.
Why? Cause they’re knocked up.
Leaving the men left in their outfit desperately overwhelmed.
When men go down to the sea in ships...
When women first started to be asigned to ships in the Navy
and found out that it wasnt all the cute fun they thought it would be
they got preggers just to be reasigned to shore duty...
Well, I guess they should only be allowed to serve on submarines then..../snorting sarcasm.
Seriously, no one can convince me this is not done with the intention of moral, and emasculating intentions.
AKA, PC.
Pretty soon they will adopt a policy of no heterosexuals of different sex can serve together. Talk about a wiggy world.
They’ll still get pregnant. It’s just an awful, awful idea all around.
Seriously, if a woman wants to be GI Jane just work for a firearms company, firearms trainer, work with weapons, do survival training out in the parks and such. Don’t do it in the military. If and when you change your mind, you leave other military guys at risk because they were counting on you.
The pregnancy option is always the way out for the ladies. Once diagnosed as pregnant, the military moves heaven and earth to remove Sally or Jane from the zone and send her somewhere safe to have the kid. Her billet is NOT filled with a replacement, so the remaining members of the unit have to work to cover the job she was assigned.
I guess thats why they pushed sterilization in Obamacare... as well as mil abortions.