Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vaquero

This no felon should have guns thing seems to be a knee jerk reaction to the idea of FELONS, you know, scary criminal types, slinking around your fair city carrying all manner of weapons. Bazookas, “assault” rifles, “switchblades” maybe an 10” barrel .44 mag under their trenchcoat. Just looking to rape and pillage.

If you really think about it, it just makes the court complicit in gun control. Which, IMO, is exactly what it is intended to do.

Just cause someone may be convicted of a felony doesn’t nessesarily make them violent.

Laws of man don’t supercede the God given right of self defense.


48 posted on 04/25/2012 8:42:20 AM PDT by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: saleman

I cannot say I believe every house hold should own guns however I do believe there should be 3 minimal requirements to own guns 1st gun saftey training for every one in the house hold 2nd, required to be a member of the NRA and 3rd be registerd voter of an anti- democrat or liberalist party. (IMO the only diffrence between liberals, democrats and comunist is the spelling.) And any household meeting these minimal requirements should have many guns. And lots of ammo


52 posted on 04/25/2012 9:30:32 AM PDT by kmjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson