Romney’s Record on Judicial and Legal Appointments: Can he be trusted to appoint conservatives? 2011

AmyContrada.com ^ | December 9, 2011 | Amy Contrada

[SoConPubbie]

And the Un-Masking of Mitt Romney, the lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal, continues . . . "If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton "We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan "A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792 "It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams

[arderkrag]

Of course he can’t be trusted!

[svcw]

To the headline: no he can not, and it doesn’t matter anymore because he has been crowned the winner.

[brownsfan]

“To the headline: no he can not, and it doesn’t matter anymore because he has been crowned the winner.”

There’s still work to do. We have to be sure anyone but Mitt wins the election. ANYONE.

[SoConPubbie]

There’s still work to do. We have to be sure anyone but Mitt wins the election. ANYONE.

svcw,

Don't feed the Obama troll.

[mnehring]

Possibly manipulated into it.

[brownsfan]

“Don’t feed the Obama troll.”

It appears your logic is somewhat clouded.

You post several articles a day critical of Romney.
Romney will be the nominee.
If you don’t want Romney... what’s left?

You, coming from a blue state, in the midst of all those liberals, I have to wonder, maybe YOU are the Obama troll? The left often accuses the opposition of doing exactly what they, themselves are trying to do. (Tip of the hat to Jim Quinn).

[SoConPubbie]

You, coming from a blue state, in the midst of all those liberals, I have to wonder, maybe YOU are the Obama troll? The left often accuses the opposition of doing exactly what they, themselves are trying to do. (Tip of the hat to Jim Quinn).

Sorry, but all anyone has to do is look at your posting record and your posts about supporting Obama to see that you are the Obama troll.

[brownsfan]

“Sorry, but all anyone has to do is look at your posting record and your posts about supporting Obama to see that you are the Obama troll.”

If anyone applies logic, and looks at what you’re posting, I think you win the troll award.

[SoConPubbie]

It appears your logic is somewhat clouded.

You post several articles a day critical of Romney. Romney will be the nominee. If you don’t want Romney... what’s left?

Nope, your logic seems to be non-existant:

1. You are on a site devoted to conservative principles.
2. Romney has no conservative principles
3. The owner of this site has stated regularly that he will never vote for Romney and there will be no promotion of that lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal Mitt Romney on this site.
4. What's left is voting your conservative principles (with you I think they are probably more like suggestions than principles) and voting for either a third-party actual conservative in the POTUS position or writing in and finding acceptable CONSERVATIVE republicans in down-ticket races.

[Lady Lucky]

I would bet someone very close to Mitt Romney (ie, immediate family) is gay. His sympathies are too intense for it to be a matter of abstract belief.

[Jack Burton007]

Romney will appoint the very same candidates that Obama would appoint. It’s already proven by his past appointments.

This cheetah (should be pronounced Cheater) will not be changing his spots if elected so if anyone is thinking he will they should buy a bridge I have for sale in Brooklyn.

[going hot]

Hey, good morning, once again.

Can i get in on this?You are the troll,

No, you are the troll,

No, both of you are the troll.

You were a troll before troll was invented.

You are such a troll, trolls are afraid to cross your bridge.

Obama sucks, but Mittens sucks worse.

He is the sucker of suckdom, complete suckee, or would that be sucker?

This is fun!

[ZX12R]

Of course he can’t be trusted!

No kidding. He is buying the presidency, simply because he wants to BE president. He doesn't care one whit whether it's conservative or libtard. He just wants to be president.

[brownsfan]

“This is fun!”

That makes you the troll of all trolls. You are to trolls what Adam was to humanity.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Well, one thing we do know for certain is that Obama will definitely appoint activist left-wingers to the Court.

As for who Romney will appoint when he is no longer constrained by the vagaries of the Massachusetts judicial appointment system, which required the approval of an all-Democratic committee to be effective, we can't know for sure. He didn't have the chance to appoint any justices to the Massachusetts Supreme Court, and ideology tends to matter less for lower court appointments.

So the bottom line is that we can't be certain that Romney will appoint conservatives, but we do know that Obama will appoint liberals. Seems there's only one way to go if you're a betting man.

[BruceS]

You appear to be confused. On your personal page, you posted "I can’t believe more than half of American adults are idiots, but it has been proven to me on 11/04/2008.

You get the government you deserve."

But you advocate ensuring that anyone but Mitt wins the election. That means (in practical terms) you advocate Obama win, since there are only two realistic choices at this point.

It appears you want all of us to have the government you deserve.

As for me, I do see a difference between Romney (who will be have to at least listen to conservatives, but probably will have to act conservative) and Obama (who will have no practical limits if re-elected). See my tag line.

[brownsfan]

“As for me, I do see a difference between Romney (who will be have to at least listen to conservatives, but probably will have to act conservative) and Obama (who will have no practical limits if re-elected). See my tag line.”

The official FR party line is anyone but Mitt. Don’t vote Obama, don’t vote Romney. Write in Palin.

I assume if enough of us do that Obama will win, and the GOPe will be taught a lesson!

Openly supporting Romney is strongly discouraged here.

[brownsfan]

“4. What’s left is voting your conservative principles (with you I think they are probably more like suggestions than principles) and voting for either a third-party actual conservative in the POTUS position or writing in and finding acceptable CONSERVATIVE republicans in down-ticket races.”

Ah ha! There you have it. Take people who would normally vote Republican, and encourage them to vote for someone who will not win, thus negating their vote. The result?!

You sir, are an Obama troll.

Good day.

[arderkrag]

Openly supporting Romney is strongly discouraged here.

...Thankfully. I personally wish the "soft" support of Romney would be banned as well.