Romney fundraiser: Donors 'coming out of the woodwork'

The Hill ^ | 4/25/12 | Cameron Joseph

[Aria]

Thanks! I am not suicidal and don’t see any real point in arguing with those who are.

If this were a normal opponent maybe they would have something of a point, but Obama seeks to destroy us in so many way - we have a true enemy in the WH.

Only a fool and/or a Democrat would risk 4 more years of Obama.

[sand88]

I’m not supporting Obama because unlike you I’m not voting for either democrat.

Well stated. Mitt is a hard-core Statist. If people believe things will be better with Mitt they are truly delusional.

Mitt will do nothing to reign in government. At the end of his term, the RATS will walk in with all the new voters, thanks to Mitt's strong embrace of Amnesty.

Conservatives need to know that ALL of Mitts failures will relentlessly be blamed on one thing --- CONSERVATIVES.

The Press, the left and most RINOs will have a field day assigning ALL the ills to the Conservative policies of Mitt. The reality is NONE of Mitt's policies will be Conservative.

So, for all the fools who will vote for Mitt know that Conservatives will be royally screwed by the end of his four years.

[SoConPubbie]

I'm actually way more concerned about the future of America than I am about any of this.

That's exactly the point many of us, including CrippleCreek are trying to make.

With Romney, we don't only have to go through his inevitable Progressive Liberalism, as he no longer has to pay attention to conservatives, but we will also have to deal with the aftermath, the destruction, just like in MA, of the National GOP as a home of conservatives, because he is going to destroy the GOP by his dalliances with the Left-wing.

[who knows what evil?]

Romney...turning America into Massachusetts. I will vote for Goode or write in Palin. I am more worried about being judged by G-d for caving on my principles than any earthly elections...no Romney. America didn’t want a conservative, so let the chips fall where they may.

[Eye of Unk]

What to do if Romney drops out or quits?

[cripplecreek]

Mitt will do nothing to reign in government. At the end of his term, the RATS will walk in with all the new voters, thanks to Mitt's strong embrace of Amnesty.

Agreed, he's not going to touch the EPA, he's not going to do anything to rein in the marxist indoctrination in our schools. He's not going to cut spending or do anything to help the economy in any appreciable way. He's not going to stop wasting money on green energy scams. He won't do anything to encourage an expansion of our freedoms.

He's nothing but the candidate for people who don't have the courage to switch parties and become democrats and I refuse to accept their blame or their tantrums.

[cripplecreek]

I am more worried about being judged by G-d for caving on my principles than any earthly elections...no Romney. America didn’t want a conservative, so let the chips fall where they may.

Exactly. If America is lost, there's little chance that I alone can save her but at least I can face my maker knowing I actually tried.

[rogue yam]

You know a great deal about what Mitt will and won’t do if he becomes President.

I know much less about this than you do.

[rogue yam]

I think we can all agree that it is your self-regard that is most important here.

[rogue yam]

With Romney, we don't only have to go through his inevitable Progressive Liberalism, as he no longer has to pay attention to conservatives, but we will also have to deal with the aftermath, the destruction, just like in MA, of the National GOP as a home of conservatives, because he is going to destroy the GOP by his dalliances with the Left-wing.

I have a different expectation as to how Mitt will govern if elected than you do.

[rollo tomasi]

Romney already has empirical evidence on how he will govern. Before you say well that is just “liberal” Mass. remember practicality by Republican Presidents has perpetuated the spending orgy ever since Harding took the reigns.

[rogue yam]

Romney already has empirical evidence on how he will govern.

So does Obama. Obama's evidence is more readily applicable.

Before you say well that is just “liberal” Mass. remember practicality by Republican Presidents has perpetuated the spending orgy ever since Harding took the reigns.

It is certainly liberal Massachusetts. Everybody governs in context. The present context for the next Present is that our country is going broke. Obama appears to want this. I think it is more likely than not that Romney does not want America to go broke. This is an important point.

[TheOldLady]

Boop the Bank Robber’s Nose!

Don’t Let Him Get Away With It!

Donate monthly to help abolish FReepathons
Sponsors will bark up $10 for each new monthly sign-up
Another sponsor will contribute $25 for each new Dollar-a-Day donor

[Aria]

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/2073/397/Obama_Changed_His_Name_In_Canada.html

[rollo tomasi]

Both governed to expand government

Both governed to expand open faggotry in government

Both expanded murder for convenience disguised as some pseudo-right of terminating pregnancy

Both promoted regulations to curb AGW

Both appointed Justices that seek to bypass the legislation process and rule by case law

And both will not stop the collectivist mindset that destroys societies

Keep being “practical” the statists are counting on your gullibility.