[Lazlo in PA]

I see you post article after article after article on Milt and his record. That is fine, but I also notice you post nothing constructive on a solution to the problem. Should we back Ron Paul? Fred Karger? Harold Stassen? Focus on certain down ticket races? Start doing crack and get on welfare?

What is the point of this endless parade of old article on matters we are all to well aware of here at FR? How about putting this much effort in trying to come up with ideas.

[cripplecreek]

I’ll be voting for Virgil Goode.

[SoConPubbie]

see you post article after article after article on Milt and his record. That is fine, but I also notice you post nothing constructive on a solution to the problem. Should we back Ron Paul? Fred Karger? Harold Stassen? Focus on certain down ticket races? Start doing crack and get on welfare?

What is the point of this endless parade of old article on matters we are all to well aware of here at FR? How about putting this much effort in trying to come up with ideas.

1. I'm voting for Virgil Goode, Constitution Party, if Romney, God Forbid, becomes the nominee.
2. This isn't a GOP site, it's a conservative site devoted to conservative principles, politicians, and political candidates. That leaves Mitt Romney out.

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton

[khelus]

Here’s two you might be interested in from SoConPubbie

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2876451/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2876424/posts

[Grampa3711]

Consider an open convention featuring a challenge to Mitt. He might have enough delegates to “override” the challenge, or a brokered convention might result (with party bosses tossing out all candidates and nominating... Portman?) Would that be better or worse than going with Mitt? Just thinking, as you requested.