“Are you still as certain that the girl with the earrings is the same girl as Stanley Ann Dunham?”
I have never used any terms of “certainty” but thanks to your photos I am more convinced than ever that the “Dunham” jaw” and other features line up perfectly to my eye.
Regarding FM Davis, I see no resemblance to Barry nor do I see any resemblance to BHO Sr. I only see a resemblance between Barry, his mom, Stanley Ann, and his gramps Stanley Armour who all possess the “Dunham jaw” with the prominent chin...as also obviously and incontrovertibly shared with the naked model in question.
As we have previously discusses and disagree over, I find the striking resemblance of Barry to the dead brother David Obama that Mark Ndesandjo claims to be his brother fathered by BHO Sr to be the best evidence that BHO Sr. is Barry's father. The resemblance is so striking that some, including you, have claimed that the pictures of David are actually pictures of Barry, even though it is obvious that Barry could not have been 2 years old in Kenya with BHO Sr and Ruth Baker Obama in the picture you claim was taken in 1966 when Barry was five (and the picture was from 1970-71 according to a living eyewitness, Mark Ndesand).
The INS FOIA doc provide contemporaneous proof that Stanley Ann planned to go to a university in Seattle in Sept 1961, so to Polk docs and witness accounts of her line up with that Ann Obama being her, as to the transcripts. To make your narrative work the INC docs and UW and UH doc must ALL have been forged.
There is no evidence provided in the INS FOIA docs that the notation of a “wife in the Philippines” was provided by BHO Sr. of was a brain fart by an INS worker in Baltimore who didn't know the difference between Hawaii and the Philippines...and no proof of any “Anne Obama” giving birth to a mixed race baby anywhere on the planet.
You are willing to accept the INS docs as proof of a non-SADO mom for a BHO Sr. baby, but you don't accept the same docs as proof that BHO Sr and SADO were claimed to have been married (as reported to INS by UH) or that SADO was planning to be in Seattle in the fall of 1961.
I prefer to build a likely narrative on evidence that has been corroborated by witnesses and documents.
I don't know who Barry's father is and in early in 1961 when Stanley Ann started showing she may not have known which of two available black men was the father. It may not have mattered other than there was a need to protect KGB asset FM Davis and also likely KGB asset BHO Sr (IMO) from being implicated while under FBI counterespionage surveillance by shipping Stanley Ann off to Kenya.
...I prefer to build a likely narrative on evidence that has been corroborated by witnesses and documents. Which means you believe the birth certificate is a valid document? Lord knows THAT has been corroborated by witnesses...LOL! And btw, when you quote the content of the immigration docs, maybe you should post them - you give the impression the kenyan's 'wife' is named...she's not. Where the memo says his 'wife' plans to attend the U of WA, there's no name either, and where it says his 'wife' from whom he is separated is living in the Philippines, there's no name...
Here's the document from which I quoted:
And you wrote:
The INS FOIA doc provide contemporaneous proof that Stanley Ann planned to go to a university in Seattle in Sept 1961
Once again, there's no name. Just a girl with a child living with her parents...on 31 AUGUST 1961...So who was the girl with the kenyan in the dock image and at the Nachmannofs? The girl named Ann that Abercrombie saw? And if that INS memo is correct and genuine, he should have had no problems showing a long form birth certificate right from the start, because if his mother's name was really Stanley Ann Dunham and his father was Barack Hussein Obama from Kenya, why the forgery?
Here's the URL for the immigration docs, if you are going to quote from them, I suggest you SHOW what you are quoting FROM:
IMMIGRATION FILE
It's somewhat misleading to state you prefer to build a likely narrative on evidence that has been corroborated by witnesses and documents... when you never show any.
But be my guest, you want SAD to be the mother so badly you aren't even aware of your bias or the fact that it rests purely upon the shape of a CHIN. You have so far been the greatest stumbling block to freepers understanding they have been hoodwinked as to his origins, THE TOTALLY MISSING FIRST TWO YEARS OF HIS LIFE. But be my guest, you probably aren't aware of your bias, it's your country. I'm just an aussie who hates lies.