I don’t care how the photos were labeled.
The 4 nudie photos in your post to me are of two different women.
The black and white ones are Marcy.
The tinted ones are of a Stanley Ann look-alike or Stanley Ann.
You might not think the tinted photos are Stanley Ann (I’m not positive they are her either) but there is no way that any reasonable person would mix up these two women.
They are completely different looking. It’s not even close.
So whoever labeled them as the same woman either had some sort of agenda or was blind as a bat.
I didn't post nude images, I posted FACES.
The black and white ones are Marcy.
They are identified as such throughout various articles on the web, so I presume that's who it is.
The tinted ones are of a Stanley Ann look-alike or Stanley Ann.
They are of a Stanley Ann look-alike whose images first appeared on free-vintage-porn com a website I traced as the result of the name and serial number on the bottom of one of the three images published...TWO YEARS AGO and the images themselves had already been removed. That website had a section devoted to photographs of girls wearing nothing but high heeled shoes and stockings...
You might not think the tinted photos are Stanley Ann (I’m not positive they are her either) but there is no way that any reasonable person would mix up these two women.
It was not unreasonable however, to make a comparison collage of the faces of the girl who is the Stanley Ann look-a-like and the girl (Marcy Moore) who has been indentified on various websites as the model for the images that came from the free-vintage-porn com website - THAT'S WHAT COMPARISONS ARE FOR. YOU LOOK, YOU DECIDE.
They are completely different looking. It’s not even close.
There you go, that's how it works. I made the collages, I labelled the girls. You have decided that Marcy Moore isn't the same girl as the girl from the VINTAGE PORN WEBSITE - fine. But now you can see that the provocative photographs ARE NOT Stanley Ann Dunham either.
So whoever labeled them as the same woman either had some sort of agenda or was blind as a bat.
I had an agenda. I simply wanted to show that there's no way anyone can be certain that the provocative photographs were of SAD, and the very idea that the author of that new book who says he found THE ORIGINALS TWO YEARS AGO in a 'house' FMD VACATED WHEN HE DIED IN 1987 is not believable. He found them on the web as everyone else did, because by the time I got to the website two years ago, they had already been removed.