[David]

I refuted your claim in #190 that the image in #188 was from 1962. The #188 is almost certainly NOT an image of a 1962 computer printout and it does NOT need to be to be genuine. I explained that the computer printout could have been produced from anytime between when the records were automated (likely long after 1962) and the most recent hand typed addition to the image which was receipt of a 1982 transcript from UH. My transcript from an Ivy League university was automated as early as 1972, BTW.

You have no personal knowledge of all 1962 UW transcript office policies and possible alternative methods of recording and communicating transcript information by your own admission. You are speculating. Perhaps some were handwritten and some were typed in 1962 depending on the person preparing the transcript or the state of the file.

Nonsense. The University delivered the #188 document as the original entry record and subsequently sent a letter to WND saying so.

That document is subject to all of the objections set out above. It is just another fraudulent document presented in support of the legend.

No, I am not speculating; Yes, in fact I have absolute first hand knowledge of all the facts I set out above.

Now as to "all policies"? The Liberal Politicians who run the University might well in fact have a policy of approving use of University records and procedures to create fraudulent documents in support of the Obama fairy tale--that wouldn't surprise me.

But on the current record, #188 is the historical document and on its face it is clearly a fake.

[Fred Nerks]

So he threw as much tripe at you as he could and none of it stuck? Poor baby. He won’t come back, when he’s outed, he gets a headache and disappears.