[so_real]

So how is it that little barry bastard commie is not a weapon against the TEA party candidates in Congress?

He is an opponent on the field in front of our friends in Congress. He is a known combatant with his own arsenal. "Party Loyalty", however, is not one of his weapons. I doubt he'll convince our TEA party friends to rubber stamp his liberal agenda for sake of party unity as Romney could.

how do you suceed by returning the bastard to the White House, Ereic Holder to the JUST US department, and perhaps four SCOTUS judges to the bench?

The opportunity for success was chisel'd away as Bachmann, Cain, Santorum, and now Gingrich were driven out of the race. Even should a liberal with an "R" behind his name defeat a liberal with a "D" behind his name (unlikely), I still don't call it "success".

And when the liberal with an "R" behind his name makes Supreme Court appointees in the same vein as he's made judicial appointments in his home state (75% liberal) it is even further from success as it is done under the "republican" banner. You fear Obama's appointments? Have a look at Romney's. There is no difference and that's the reality of it.

[MHGinTN]

Actually, there is a very big difference, but I understand you not wanting to address it. With the SCOTUS appointments, we have to have a majority int he Senate so the nominees are not liberal swill like he nominated int he democrat controlled state where he was governor. The key is voting in sufficient TEA party folks to drag Milt to the right.