[spokeshave]

But they also don’t want to enforce the limit enacted by Congress, because that would require removing people who have entered the country in violation of the limit, which could cost them votes and support, too.

So how come they vote as non citizens....enquiring minds seek to know.

[Lmo56]

This is no different than when the 9th Circuit upheld a separate law that punished employers from knowingly employing illegal workers.

In that case, the 9th Circuit stated that the Arizona law was ENTIRELY CONSISTENT with the federal law - and allowed it to take effect. The 9th Circuit said that Arizona DID NOT intrude on federalism.

Funny thing is that when it came to Section 2b of SB 1070, the 9th Circuit PREVENTED it from taking effect - even though, it is ENTIRELY CONSISTENT with federal law [as in the case, above] ... Nimrodz !!!

[Regulator]

All of this would not be happening without Plyler v. Doe.

It was unconstitutional nonsense foisted on America in 1982 by the Leftist leftovers of the Warren court.

[Republican1795.]

The Tenth Amendment was supposed to be the final word.

[Republican1795.]

The Tenth Amendment was supposed to be the final word.

[Republican1795.]

The Tenth Amendment was supposed to be the final word.

[Isabel C.]

Federal officials don’t want to repeal the limit and declare the borders open, which would be unpopular.

Unpopular? It would be disastrous.