[D-fendr]

Same thing happens in your proposal of President Obama. And if all these things aren't enough to kick them out now…

When you're weighing options for 'least bad' and one of them is "President Obama," it's a no-brainer.

A lot of the differences in argument here I think reduce to two sides: One thinks the other underestimates how bad Obama will be; one thinks the other underestimates how bad Romney will be.

[Antoninus]

A lot of the differences in argument here I think reduce to two sides: One thinks the other underestimates how bad Obama will be; one thinks the other underestimates how bad Romney will be.

That's it in a nutshell. My position comes from following Mitt Romney's career closely since 1994. The man is a cancer and will do to the country what he did to Massachusetts.

Obama is a known quantity and a nearly exhausted force from what I've seen. On the contrary, Romney's real agenda is practically unknown and he is benefiting from being "Not Obama" which gives him what might appear to be a mandate if he wins. But recall the "etch-e-sketch" comment and tremble if you truly are a conservative.

There is no way in hell I'll endorse a candidate like that with my vote.