|
 |
Posted on 05/02/2012 9:54:32 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
Generally speaking, I think the Washington Post’s Eugene Robinson is the most profoundly stupid and uninsightful writer on any editorial page in any paper in any country. But file this one under “Blind Hog/Acorn”.
Moderator Wolf Blitzer opened Tuesday’s Republican debate by introducing himself and adding, for some reason, “Yes, that’s my real name.” A few moments later, the party’s most plausible nominee for president said the following: “I’m Mitt Romney, and yes, Wolf, that’s also my first name.”
But it’s not. Mitt is the candidate’s middle name. His first name is Willard.
And people wonder why this guy has an authenticity problem?
For a while Dem strategists have been making public pronouncements on Romney’s seeming inability to distinguish fact from fiction and his near pathological instinct to make his audience believe he is just like them. Even Jon Stewart has poked fun at Romney’s flip flops.
When the election season started I was convinced that even though I did not like Romney, he was the most electable candidate in the pack. Since then I’ve changed my views. Romney can’t win in a general election because very few people, outside the 20% who like his hair and a handful of devoted fluffers, will vote for the man.
He will lose a lot of conservatives because we fear that he will energetically return to his past persona as a liberal New England governor if he is elected. As the GOP winning the Senate in 2012 is very close to a “gimme” we have to ask: can conservatism survive a President Romney and a Senate Majority Leader McConnell?
He will lose a lot of GOP, as opposed to conservative, support because he is a supremely smarmy and untrustworthy character whose core value is defined by a strong belief that he should be president and nothing more.
While Plouffe and Carville are validating our feelings about Romney’s squishiness, the real attack, the one that will strip away the moderate center that Romney has been relying on is waiting in the wings.
Obama can’t attack Romney as a flip-flopper because many of the flips and flops Romney has held dear at one time or another are actually Obama’s own positions. The Romney response to that line of attack in a national election is easy: I held that position then but have sense developed information that makes me believe it was incorrect and I have changed it and everyone want’s a pragmatic president who can change his mind, right?
The main attack will be on Romney’s long time affiliation with the corporate chop-shop known as Bain Capital. In an environment were most people are concerned about their jobs and virtually everyone is angry at Wall Street, Romney will be the perfect poster boy for the 1% that the “99%” rails on and on about.
So abandoned by conservatives, the GOP, and moderates who is left as his logical constituency? The same tiny group of admirers that follow him today.
I don’t know if Newt Gingrich or Rick Perry can beat Obama. What I am positive of is that Mitt Romney cannot win a general election against any national Democrat figure. The only saving grace is that he probably can’t win a GOP primary either.
|
|
Why vote for RINOmney when I can get the same socialism delivered much faster if I vote for the Cretin?
But for MONTHS they told us that Romney’s got what voters crave... He’s got electability
Willard Mitt romney
Willard for Willard Marriot the owner of those Mormon hotels where porn is available in every room..
and Willard Mitt Romney in all his years of the paid position on the board didnt ever close them down...
Abortion, same sex marriage, porn..
and we are told this is a MORAL guy ???
In what Bizarro Land ???
Ain't supportin' Ron Paul either. Guy's on his own.
Communique from Headquarters
Slow down man. Us handlers back at headquarters are starting to get worried you might blow your cover. Try being a little more subtle. It’s starting to get dicey that you are working for us. Black propaganda is an art of finesse. The boys in Chicago suggest you throw in a pro-Romney post every once in a while. Just to throw the enemy off. You are too important of an asset for us to lose. We are getting reports that the Mormons are triangulating your position. So slow down, and play this out right.
Your Handler
David Axelrod
Communique from Headquarters
Slow down man. Us handlers back at headquarters are starting to get worried you might blow your cover. Try being a little more subtle. It’s starting to get dicey that you are working for us. Black propaganda is an art of finesse. The boys in Chicago suggest you throw in a pro-Romney post every once in a while. Just to throw the enemy off. You are too important of an asset for us to lose. We are getting reports that the Mormons are triangulating your position. So slow down, and play this out right.
Your Handler
David Axelrod
a) Obama (D)
b) Romney (R)
c) [Dream Candidate (R)] write-in (= Obama)
d) None of the above (= Obama)
We need to stay UNITED. Yes, Mitt is horrible, but ZERO is worse!!
So what are you going to do since all the conservatives have dropped out of the race? He Mitt will be the Republican Nominee! Vote for? who? Paul?
You had better get some money together and some new voters registered for mitt... because many of us are never going to vote for that leftist, baby killing liar. It isn’t that we just will not vote for him... we cannot vote for him.
LLS
What ever!
“If he publicly announces that he will pick only strong constitutionalists as judges then I’ll support him.”
Milf Romney says that he is a conservative but we all now know that he is a lying liberal.
Why would you believe him if he says that he’ll pick strong constitutionalists as SCOTUS judges?
If Milf said that it’s a bright, sunny day today I would verify that with two people before believing him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.