Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat

Arms merely means a weapon. And yes, Gov’t cannot restrict such. Having a weapon is not against the law. If I choose to use a slingshot, sword or super soaker, so be it.


21 posted on 05/02/2012 4:48:10 PM PDT by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Theoria
You would be probably be amazed at what I can do with properly distilled snake venom and a set of pretty fake fingernails!
Not to mention a simple Judo lethal defense technique, that works every time, without fail.

That said, no government can pass laws outlawing insanity.

OTOH, a squirt gun is a toy, not a weapon, and a temporary public ban on protesters carrying them in downtown Tampa during the RNC convention is not something that goes against the right to bear arms, nor the right to protest.

But you know that, right?

27 posted on 05/02/2012 5:26:34 PM PDT by sarasmom ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xZsFe6dM3EY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson