Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Certain precincts in this county are not going to vote for Obama,”...“I don’t want to say it, but we all know why.” ..A retired state employee, Jason Foreman, interjected, “I’ll say it: it’s because he’s black.”

When liberals say this, they are lying and THEY KNOW THEY ARE LYING. A simple thought experiment is sufficient to establish this. Suppose we had a credible black candidate, who hated abortion and homosexuality, upheld the 2nd amendment, abhorred communism, supported realistic measures to get out of debt, wanted to secure the border, etc.... how would all these "racists" vote. ALL LIBERALS know that 100% of the Tea Party patriots would vote FOR such a black man.

Our problem with Obama is that he is IN THE WRONG, on every issue of substance. The accusation of "racism" against us, for opposing him, is NEVER made in good faith, it is ALWAYS a conscious intentional slander, made because the liberals do not have, and know they do not have, any actual substantive arguments.

I have lost all patience with liberals. The last 3 years have shown beyond all doubt, that liberalism is the philosophy of those who are INTENTIONALLY LYING for illegitimate gain, period, end of story. Liberalism is NOT... NOT EVER.... an honest mistake by a good hearted person. It CAN"T be. By now, they CAN'T NOT KNOW that they are wrong. They are not stupid, they are not misguided, they are DEVILS in human form.

36 posted on 05/04/2012 12:12:15 AM PDT by Rytwyng (I'm still fond of the United States. I just can't find it. -- Fred Reed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rytwyng
ALL LIBERALS know that 100% of the Tea Party patriots would vote FOR such a black man.

And how about this for a newsflash for Steubenville, Ohio, DimRats and The New York Times: So would the hardhat voters they're complaining about.

Fifty cents says these are the same voters the NYT and other MediaRats called "hardhats" (note the mild put-down) when they voted for George C. Wallace in 1968, and "Reagan Democrats" when they voted for Ronnie Reagan 12 years later.

The problem the 'Rats have with these guys is that they're Americans first, and they never stopped being Americans, no matter how many times they were harangued by Left agitators and "authority figures" and "opinionmakers" .... because they know that America has always been more right, and more centered, than any UMC leftist who ever dunked a crumpet or slurped white wine.

38 posted on 05/04/2012 3:12:26 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Rytwyng
When liberals say this, they are lying and THEY KNOW THEY ARE LYING. A simple thought experiment is sufficient to establish this. Suppose we had a credible black candidate, who hated abortion and homosexuality, upheld the 2nd amendment, abhorred communism, supported realistic measures to get out of debt, wanted to secure the border, etc.... how would all these "racists" vote. ALL LIBERALS know that 100% of the Tea Party patriots would vote FOR such a black man.

The Republicans had that candidate this year, HERMAN CAIN.

Look at the Democrat and enemedia response, "destroy, must destroy."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

53 posted on 05/04/2012 9:40:33 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson