Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Frank discussion re our loss to Obama/Romney and the future direction of FR and tea party movement
Click here to pledge your support! ^ | May 4, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 05/04/2012 6:31:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,521-1,525 next last
To: Bikkuri; jimrob; All
“I am still going to write in Palin (if the convention doesn’t go through).”

In some states you have to be careful about ‘write in’ voting.

I was told by a poll worker ( the one handing out ballots ) that if you ‘wrote-in’ anyone that didn't register in advance as a ‘write-in candidate, it was a spoiled ballot and wouldn't be counted.

That protest ‘Donald Duck’ vote would cause your entire ballot to never be counted. That could void all your down ticket votes.

If in doubt of your state law/rules on write-in voting, leave that slot blank.

An under vote won't spoil a ballot.

181 posted on 05/04/2012 7:55:36 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

The Rombots are now dead to me.... clarification , (not literally)..meaning, I will not acknowledge them....will not support them..will not even look at them..period. My back is all they will ever see..or ever deserve.


182 posted on 05/04/2012 7:56:02 AM PDT by Earthdweller (Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......? Embrace a ruler today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I agree with every word you say. I am so tired and disgusted with the GOP elites and their faux conservatism.

BUT I will vote for ANYone to get Obama OUT. To sit home and not vote in revolt would give the election to the liberal progressive traitors.

It kills me to hear so many conservatives who will refuse to vote since its Romney. Well for goodness sakes....vote AGAINST Obama by at least casting a vote for Romney.

We MUST do this or we will be so far into a socialist form of government from another 4 years of what we have now, it will be impossible to bring the nation back.


183 posted on 05/04/2012 7:56:14 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim,

Bottom line is that Obama is killing us. He will have unfettered power once he gets another 4 yrs without the worry of re election. I'm relieved that you have had to look more closely at the realistic bottom line.

Romney 2012. (it makes me queasy but this is all we got)

I love this site and will help out with the financial bottom line as much as possible through a donation. You have given us a forum for true conservatives, I appreciate that more than you know.

184 posted on 05/04/2012 7:57:15 AM PDT by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Well, you are still here and it’s been a few minutes.

I’m now thinking that the old FR is back, big time!


185 posted on 05/04/2012 7:58:02 AM PDT by unique1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: sitetest; Jim Robinson

More like the pro-Romeney people stop accusing those of us who refuse to vote for Romney of being Democrat plats, liberals, and stupid.


186 posted on 05/04/2012 7:58:49 AM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cajunangel

You ask a lot of questions. Highly sensitive questions. Stupid ones too.

“Did you get so disgusted with the GOP you are a democrat now?Am I posting on a democratic forum? WHAT IS GOING ON?Please kindly explain. Thank-You!”

Why are you asking these questions? Why don’t you know what’s going on?

Ahh. I see. You answered my questions with the first words you FReeped...

“I just signed in for the first time in awhile...”

Look noobie. Try to keep up with things and avoid making zot-worthy remarks. Read more - learn more....


187 posted on 05/04/2012 7:58:56 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The Tea Party will never succeed unless it starts by winning at the local or state level. Doctrinaire conservatives are a minority in this country.


188 posted on 05/04/2012 7:58:59 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Call it a truce, call it “not talking to them” call it whatever you want.

I will call it by it’s true name: Surrender.

Surrender to the RINO establishment.

Surrender to Rockefeller Republicans.

Surrender to GOP Liberals.

They knew and were counting that we fear Obama more than we desire real conservatives. Therefore they gave us the middle finger and gave us the candidate that THEY wanted. And it’s playing out according to plan.

Not me suckers. I’m out. I will not vote for Romney and I will not vote for any GOP candidate that endorses and/or campaigns alongside him. He is a liberal and an enemy.


189 posted on 05/04/2012 7:59:09 AM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

The bottom line is that money still controls most of politics and Romney had the money. The only way around this that I see going forward is for conservatives to come together early on ONE conservative candidate to pool our presidential resources behind.

I’m talking well beyond the boundaries of FR and the Tea Party to one candidate with broad enough support and access to resources that he/she could have both the political clout and the financial clout to win the nomination and represent most of out values (not necessarily all as politics is not about purity but about what you can accomplish).

As I see it, the problem this time was two-fold: a great many conservatives were waiting for Sarah Palin and she wound up leaving us at the altar. By the time she formally stepped out, there were too many quasi-conservatives each getting a small chunk of the vote and fighting each other.

In 2015, we must DEMAND that Palin be in or out far far sooner and have a second choice already clearly in place. Had we gone into June fully and uniformly behind another conservative, be it Cain, Perry, Newt or whomever, that candidate would have stood a far greater chance of winning the nomination and then most would have far less griping to do now.

Ideally, that candidate should be nationally known and tested with a proven track record to run on. Outsiders and gadflies can be popular but they can also have skeletons in the closet that can torpedo the campaign as soon as they come to light.

But, for now, do all you can in down-ballot races and, if you’re in a swing state, see to it that Obama does not win. If you don’t live in a swing state and can’t stomach Romney, leave it blank or write in or go third party or whatever floats your boat but if your state is going to be close, do nothing that is going to help Obama get re-elected.


190 posted on 05/04/2012 7:59:15 AM PDT by OrangeHoof (Evil never reveals the truth until it's too late to flee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
What is wise about giving Barack Obama the Supreme Court for the next generation or two?

Who says he will have it? If we had a conservative Senate leader and a decent majority, we could SHUT DOWN any Obama SCOTUS picks for the next 4 years.

I want the failures and the civil war to be on OBAMA's watch, not a GOPer, not even Romney.

191 posted on 05/04/2012 7:59:37 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Does this mean that all those who were banned or those marked as a troll and lost their posting privileges for supporting Romney will be reinstated?


192 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:04 AM PDT by CentralTexasAg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montanajoe

I agree... I think there are going to be many threads I will be skipping over :p


193 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:16 AM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: ETL; All
It might be 8 years of Romney.

Right. 2016 election will be either:

a) r0mney vs whatver turd the demonicRats serve up

b) Another Republican free-for-all vs whatever turd the demonicRats serve up to succeed 0bama's second term.

I'd like anyone who thinks that a hypothetical President r0mney would see meaningful conservative opposition in 2016 to explain how they think that will happen.

I'd also like to see serious, meaningful discussion as to how the 2016 "Republican free-for-all" I hypothesize above might produce a nominee we can actually vote for.

Anything else is just mental masturbation.

194 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:16 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Jim Robinson

Innuendos like that are what I think Jim wants to stop.

Just because I refuse to vote for Romney, does not make me ‘pro Obama’ or blind to Obama’s policies.


195 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:24 AM PDT by reaganaut (VAB! Voting against both Romney and Obama. Constitution party, here I come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Alas Babylon!

Thanks, Jim


196 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:33 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks for posting this.

Romney was not my first, second, third, or fourth choice in this campaign, but I still believe he is far preferable to Obama. If only because he will have to at least consider the interests of the GOP base if he wishes to maintain any support after the election. Obama won't. In any case, I wasn't going to contribute to a freepathon if I thought election discussion was going to be censored/banned.

Given that we're all at least on the same side of not liking Obama, I'm tossing something in to keep the site going.

197 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:33 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

The objective is to get rid of Obama, hold or expand contorl of the House and to take the Senate.

Everything else is meaningless.


198 posted on 05/04/2012 8:00:56 AM PDT by buffaloguy (uab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

I don’t want failures and civil war.

I want American greatness.

I suppose we’ll just have to cancel each other’s vote then.

Game on.


199 posted on 05/04/2012 8:01:08 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network ("Fall Forward")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

Basically we need to have a conservative primary before the Republican primary...


200 posted on 05/04/2012 8:01:22 AM PDT by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,521-1,525 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson