Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream
Why do you keep asking questions and bringing up situations that have already been answered and covered?

You've been told many, many times over what the situation is with McCain and you still keep coming back to it as if it's a new subject when it isn't.

321 posted on 05/08/2012 12:35:59 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
Going by Vattel and the section I quoted it is obvious that McCain would be eligible.

If you say you are going by Vattel and yet McCain isn't eligible according to you - then please provide the section of Vattel and the exact language that details why and under what circumstances McCain wouldn't be eligible.

What section of Vattel would render McCain ineligible?

Please answer the question rather than providing lame excuses for not answering the question.

322 posted on 05/08/2012 12:45:52 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson