Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: philman_36
“Vattel didn't write anything that would render McCain not a natural born citizen. The writers of our “uniform rules of naturalization” did that.”

OK then. According to Vattel - McCain would be a natural born citizen.

So to say McCain is not is to abandon Vattel and his philosophy.

Where in U.S. law do you get that McCain would be anything other than a natural born citizen?

If you are not going by U.S. law OR Vattel - then by what definition is McCain anything other than a natural born citizen?

Where is natural born citizen defined such that McCain would not qualify?

330 posted on 05/08/2012 2:20:28 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to DC to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
Where in U.S. law do you get that McCain would be anything other than a natural born citizen?
Where do you get in U. S. law that McCain is a natural born citizen?
And just because you asked your question first doesn't mean that I have to answer your question before you answer mine. I don't play that game either.

If you are not going by U.S. law OR Vattel - then by what definition is McCain anything other than a natural born citizen?
What makes you think he ever was a natural born citizen?

Where is natural born citizen defined such that McCain would not qualify?
Where is natural born citizen defined such that McCain would qualify?

Nice game. Your turn, Pong.

331 posted on 05/08/2012 2:27:12 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson