To: Clintonfatigued
Since the majority of his appointments as governor where liberal, why would he be different as prez (yea before you say , sure the Repubs in the senate would block liberals- ha ha & ha)
3 posted on
05/06/2012 10:04:14 AM PDT by
svcw
(If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
To: svcw
I could see Mitty looking out for his legacy and going down in the record books for being the first to appoint an openly homosexual judge.
7 posted on
05/06/2012 10:14:35 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
To: svcw
Because in Massachusetts, there exists a popularly-elected body known as the Governor's Council that has the sole power to review and approve judicial nominees. During Romney's tenure, 8 of the 9 seats were held by Democrats. In other words, he did not have the ability to appoint whomever he wanted. Of those he did appoint, the percentage of Republicans was much higher than the 1/9 support he had on the Governor's Council.
To: svcw
ALL of Obama’s appointments will be liberals.
16 posted on
05/06/2012 11:03:14 AM PDT by
Kansas58
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson