Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

“... a video showing radical Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers and Barack Obama at Harvard planning revolution in the United States. But the video, aired just after he died, was of Obama introducing a radical Harvard professor...”

That’s a pretty dramatic contradiction. Surely Breitbart, if he had see the video personally, would know Bell isn’t Ayers.


13 posted on 05/07/2012 7:34:24 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EDINVA

It seems pretty obvious that the Breitbart people are scared. The video they released isn’t at all like what Breitbart said he had at CPAC.

The eventual (evolving) claims by the Breitbart people (BEFORE the toxicology resuts were in) were that Breitbart had been hospitalized after a massive heart attack within the past year. But the coroner contradicted that by saying that Breitbart hadn’t seen a doctor within the past year and had no prescription drugs in his body at the time of death. So now the Breitbart people have changed their story; he was hospitalized over a year ago (to fit what the coroner said) because of an enlarged heart and was supposed to lose weight but didn’t (to explain why he hadn’t seen a doctor for a year and had no prescription meds in his body, even though he had supposedly been hospitalized with heart problems).

It’s a lot like the Trayvon Martin case, where the stories shifted to accommodate whatever new claims by the witnesses had been made public.

And the comment by the Breitbart CEO saying they are getting aggravated with WND for suspecting foul play, when the family wants to put this behind them... seems like a desperate cry for people to just shut up before Breitbart’s wife and kids are the next to be hit.

IOW, the behaviors we see are what we’d expect from people who know their loved one was assassinated and that the same thing could happen to them if they don’t obey their marching orders.

And it sounds like Christopher Lasseter understood the same message. I wonder if he moved before, or after, the coroner died.

Somebody said on Michael Savage’s show that if the tape Bretibart talked about came out then Breitbart wasn’t assassinated, but if the tape goes missing it was an assassination. Well, now Breitbart is denying that they even have a tape like what Andrew had described at CPAC. And they are claiming that probable cause for the federal felonies of forgery and fraud (regarding Obama’s BC and draft registration) is not important enough to report. IOW, they’ve gone silent on what excited Breitbart at CPAC a few weeks before his death (a video of Obama and Ayers planning revolution) AND what excited Breitbart in the last 5 hours of his life (Arpaio’s evidence and findings regarding Obama’s BC and draft registration being forged).

Everything I see regarding Breitbart’s death suggests that it was an assassination. And that especially includes the ever-shifting stories of the Breitbart people, their protesting too much, and their refusals to air what Breitbart wanted aired (while claiming they already have aired it).

Makes me think of the comment by the guy on Rush Limbaugh’s show today. Said Obama had a 3-pronged way of dealing with everything: deceive, destroy, and deflect. Deceive (lie about what you care about), destroy (then destroy the very things you claimed you cared about), and then deflect attention from the fact that you destroyed something valuable. That’s what Obama/Soros does, and it’s what they make others do when they threaten them.


111 posted on 05/07/2012 11:01:11 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: EDINVA

Yep, sounds to me like two different videos that Breitbart had.


118 posted on 05/08/2012 12:52:15 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: EDINVA
"That’s a pretty dramatic contradiction."

Yes it is.

From the article:

“The videos are going to come out; the narrative is going to come out that Barack Obama met a bunch of silver ponytails back in the 1980s like Bill (Ayers) and Bernardine Dohrn, equally radical, who said one day we’re going to have the presidency.”

Breitbart told WND at CPAC that the not-yet released videos included footage of Ayers and Obama openly discussing revolution while Obama was a student at Harvard Law School.

The video released by Breitbart.com after Breitbart’s death, however, showed law student Obama embracing Prof. Derrick Bell, a radical academic with ties to Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s radical pastor for 20 years in Chicago.

“The video did not seem as earthshattering as Breitbart initially claimed it to be, just weeks before the 43-year-old unexpectedly passed away at his home last Thursday,” the New York Daily News observed.

Bannon insisted to WND that the video released by Breitbart.com after Breitbart’s death was the film Breitbart referred to when speaking in February to CPAC.

“There is no other footage,” Bannon insisted. “We were working on the Derrick Bell video when Breitbart died, and we released to the public the video we have.”

133 posted on 05/08/2012 6:59:01 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson