Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Future Snake Eater

I’ve studied the Bible for years... and years. I’ve gone to more Bible study classes than I can remember.

I’m not a literalist. It’s impossible. It can be refuted on the first three pages of Genesis.


40 posted on 05/10/2012 10:04:27 AM PDT by altura (Looking for sanity in all the wrong places.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: altura
I’m not a literalist.

So you don't take anything in the Bible literally, or you only take parts of it literally?

49 posted on 05/10/2012 11:58:20 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: altura
I’m not a literalist. It’s impossible. It can be refuted on the first three pages of Genesis.

Only when you presume you know the full scope of what is being said.

I'm reminded of the supercilious atheist who insisted the Bible is refuted by God referring to bats as a form of "bird" ... as if our modern taxonomy and nomenclature is some absolute fabric of universe.

When guys who design and build nuclear weapons for a living write books on the validity of Genesis (Gerald Schroeder), the wise student is cautious to conclude the matter settled.

51 posted on 05/10/2012 12:17:34 PM PDT by papertyger ("And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if..."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson