What I meant was the judge should have recused himself from even hearing the case due to his sexual orientation BEFORE he even retired.
Was he known to be a homosexual when he took on the case?
This looks like a conflict of interest. Why do voters allow that?
I don’t think he came out of the closet until he made the ruling. So yes he should have recused himself but, as you know, liberals have a way to justify any behavior they choose.