Amen to Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney.
1 posted on
05/11/2012 9:41:14 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
If the life support system has computer chips made in China, check there for a possible solution.
2 posted on
05/11/2012 9:47:54 AM PDT by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
To: jazusamo
"Were kind of closing in on some ideas."
That is not acceptable at these prices.
To: jazusamo
Russian componets?
I bet that the Raptorski and the chinese knockoff will have fewer problems than this bird.
5 posted on
05/11/2012 9:59:50 AM PDT by
Thunder90
(Romney barely won in OH with a 12-1 money advantage, he can't beat Obama that way.)
To: jazusamo
I read the article and the quotes from Tony McPeak.
McPeak is an unparalleled ass who should not be allowed to comment on anything. He should be ignored, reviled, impugned and spat upon at every opportunity.
8 posted on
05/11/2012 10:12:50 AM PDT by
starlifter
(Pullum sapit)
To: jazusamo
They’ve got a team working on it. Let me help.
It sounds like they need to check system that supplies air to the pilot.
10 posted on
05/11/2012 10:19:53 AM PDT by
lurk
To: jazusamo
As I remember it, the first aircraft accepted with OBOGS (On-board Oxygen Generating System) was the AV-8B Harrier II in 1980. Since then, more and more aircraft have been fitted with OBOGS. There have been problems with OBOGS since it was accepted. For a mature system such as this to STILL having problems is absolutely mind boggling.
This not a small problem. This is a major life support problem, that must be solve. If not, we restrict all aircraft with OBOGS to not more than 10,000 feet in altitude.
To: jazusamo
Maybe the F-22 Raptors are Leftists?
13 posted on
05/11/2012 10:36:48 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: jazusamo
It’s a fixable problem. Fix it, and get ready to make more F-22s once we dump the commies who are running Washington.
14 posted on
05/11/2012 11:02:37 AM PDT by
pallis
To: jazusamo
The answer is: they're not getting enough oxygen.
Now, where's my $100K government grant for that critical study and earthshaking conclusion?
17 posted on
05/11/2012 11:22:28 AM PDT by
mikeus_maximus
(I won't vote for Romney, period. Voting for "the lesser of two evils" is still voting for evil.)
To: jazusamo
Aren’t we really getting to the point where mostly autonomous combat aircraft can do the job better anyway? It looks like human physiology is becoming the weakest link in these things on several levels. No pilot = smaller airframe, no life support, no need to mantain a deployed pilot overseas, probably much faster reaction times, ablity to perfom extreme G maneuvers that would incapacitate or kill a pilot, etc. Drones look more and more like the future of air combat.
19 posted on
05/11/2012 11:36:03 AM PDT by
Trod Upon
(Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson