Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: truth_seeker
"Based on the definition you hold in mind, it is already gone. Obama is the recent precedent, plus possibly others in the past. "

A Usurper does not set a precedent for overcoming the eligibility requirements set forth in Article Two. A usurper simply usurps. We do not currently have a legal President, thus we do not currently have a President.

52 posted on 05/12/2012 11:53:38 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Sham

“A Usurper does not set a precedent for overcoming the eligibility requirements set forth in Article Two. A usurper simply usurps. We do not currently have a legal President, thus we do not currently have a President.”

Then tell me why Congress and the courts have not acted?

And then tell me how they should act. Motions, steps, etc.

And tell me how practical it is to spend resources doing that between now and this November?

Because voting is in the Constitution.

But if you tell me you want Obama out, are voting for Goode or writing in Palin, I’ll know for sure you don’t visit reality very often.


54 posted on 05/12/2012 2:03:52 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson