[Sacajaweau]

Tray’s phone records seem to be lacking a few days.

[Constitutionalist Conservative]

As the world eagerly awaits the release

Seriously? The world is eagerly awaiting this?

[Noob1999]

I wonder if the “evidence” includes a few recent pictures of the punk sporting his gold grills, his football prowess taking down the opposition, his 6 foot+??? height; his booty from all his break-ins, and the reasons he was expelled/suspended from school?

Inquiring minds want to know!

(The Zim is being framed as nobody wants Sanford burned to the ground.)

[SamuraiScot]

the release of never-before-seen evidence

Going out on a limb here: They couldn't come up with anything that would qualify as evidence in a court of law. If there were, they would have leaked it to the "narrative" media by now. (I don't call it the news media anymore.)

[tomkat]

Be interesting to see who turns whore first for the leak $$.

To avoid confusion, this will be a separate contest from the one already won by Angela Whorey for the indictment phase.

[iowamark]

It appears that none of these “witnesses” actually witnessed the physical altercation between the two that led to the shooting. It sounds like the prosecution doesn’t have a strong case.

[Karliner]

I’m eagerly awaiting Holder letting go of his quote It’s because I’m a blackpecker, unquote and admitting to gunrunning.

[Meet the New Boss]

Their case seems to boil down to:

1) trying to pick out statements here and there from Zimmerman’s discussions with the police and frame the statements as inconsistent and therefore that Zimmerman is a liar and

2) the prosecution will need the girlfriend to say she “heard” Zimmerman attack Martin and then the jury will be asked to choose between the word of the black teenage girl on the cellphone and the word of the white-hispanic lying cracker Zimmerman.

Tawana Brawley’s revenge.

[ArmstedFragg]

67 compact discs in the package, may take a while to go through it. Standard state tactic, try to bury the defense in paperwork.

[rcrngroup]

..... but six civilian witnesses were listed: Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin — parents of the alleged victim, Trayvon Martin — as well as Trayvon's brother, Jahvarius Fulton;.....

These 3 of the 6 civilians are WITNESSES? They're Trayvon's family members for cryin out loud! There is not a witness among any of these 3. What, were they listening in on a cell phone as Trayvon (what a stupid name... kind of Jahvarius) was bashing Zimmerman's head into the concrete sidewalk?

[Condor51]

SANFORD – As the world eagerly awaits the release of never-before-seen evidence in the case against George Zimmerman, employees for Special Prosecutor Angela Corey late this afternoon provided a preview in the form of an eight-page document.

Angela, Angela. Where did you get your Law Degree, Mombasa Univ. Correspondence School? And 'Angie' how the heck did you ever pass the FL Bar? And I don't mean the Kitty-Kat Men's Club 'bar' (okay, times were tough and you needed cash, I get it).

All of your so-called 'evidence' isn't and most of your so-called 'witnesses' aren't. So here's a clue -- get ready to be flooded with motions to SUPPRESS and EXCLUDE 98% everything you have before the trial even starts. And Angie, any judge with an IQ above yours, which isn't much sweetie, WILL GRANT those said motions because they are Irrelevant, Immaterial, and/or Hearsay. In English, that means you can't use it. You'll be left 'maybe', with the two video tapes and they don't mean much either as to the actual case (see: Irrelevant).

Additionally, any first year law school could get those so-called 'Prior Bad Acts' of Zimmermann's suppressed as 'Prejudicial'. Look that one up in a law book dearie, which is blow número uno to your 'case' as to Zimmerman's character.

ps Angie --- 'The Dog Didn't Bark'. Deal with it.
(look that one up too)

[MinuteGal]

Madame Corey Defarge knows full well much of her "evidence" will be inadmissable. She's listing everything she can, real or imaginary to play to the public and taint the potential jury pool beforehand through the corrupt media.

From the looks of things, at trial she will throw all the mud evidence and the mud witnesses she can muster to the jury panel in the hopes at least some of the slime will stick.

She is wily. She knows how to play the game....which in this case is that it's NOT THE FACTS in her prosecution at trial which count, but it's just GOOD INTENTIONS AND THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE CHARGES which should be considered for a "guilty" verdict.

(....which is standard liberal reasoning).

Leni