If anything, those differences, which are very real, actually almost make the case for the asymmetric treatment women seem to want here:
If a girl is big and strong and ‘good’ enough to safely have compete on the boys’ team for a sport and there’s no equivalent girls’ team, they let her play.
If a boy is small and weak and ‘bad’ enough to safely have compete on the girls’ team, they let him play.
Having small, weak, ‘bad’ girls play on the boys’ team or having big, strong, ‘good’ boys play on the girls’ team makes no sense.
—Having small, weak, ‘bad’ girls play on the boys’ team or having big, strong, ‘good’ boys play on the girls’ team makes no sense.—
I strongly agree. They need to get over trying to “overequalize” us.
Wrong. There should be no mixing of the sexes whatsoever in sports. To do so blurs the distinctions between them and is part of a very destructive agenda.
Besides, it isn’t just in the area of size and strength that boys are superior. They also, in general, have more talent and therefore can develop greater skill. So just because a boy is small and relatively weak doesn’t mean that he wouldn’t have an advantage in girls’ sports.