“So tell me, Placenta Man, in your opinion...Was he lying then or now?
Or is this just another ‘Blame Someone Else/It’s Not My Fault’ moment”
I don’t know, but you’ll notice the issue is now over whether he lied or someone lied for him, rather than solely over how it proves he’s not a natural born citizen. That’s why this thread’s headline, and birtherism in general, are misguided in pretending everything’s a “breakthrough.” If nothing else, you oversell yourself.
It’s one thing to take a preponderance of evidence—Kenya claims him as a native son, members of his family may or may not have said or implied he’s born in Kenya, he and Michelle do things you think are un-American, the purported birth certificate looks fake, Hawaiian officials appear to be covering for him, Bill Richardson called him an immigrant or something—as suggesting he’s ineligible. It’s another thing to trumpet each and every new story as THE breakthrough that finally PROVES Obama can’t be president. It got old long ago.
By the way, I get how the MSM missed this story, but where have the birthers been on the publisher’s bio? You can comb through moldy books on 18th century maritime law and the personal correspondence of the author of the 14th amendment but don’t bother reading the flaps of his memoir?
I don’t know...
Now that is a startling admission. Do you know anything?
...you’ll notice the issue is now over whether he lied or someone lied for him...
Oh, so in actuality you're going with the ‘Blame Someone Else/It’s Not My Fault’ moment.
... rather than solely over how it proves he’s not a natural born citizen.
Farah pegged you perfectly!....Talk about burying the lead!
Ah, but that's just it! It wasn't on the flaps of his memoir, was it.
It was from...@a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama's then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel...
Nice try, but that dog don't hunt. It's been eaten, tail and all.
As someone who spent over 26 years in the printing industry and most of that in the electronic prepress world, that birth certificate posted by the White Hut is a phony as it gets.
How do I know? Well the PDF file has over 20 layers in it with each layer showing some sort of editing taking place. Had that just been an image of the actual document there would be one layer and one layer only unless it had been re-sized or cropped and then at the very most 3 layers.
One of the layers showed heavy computer generated manipulation to the signature and dates. A genuine image of the signature would show dark pixels in the center of the pen line with lighter gray pixels towards the outer edges. This phony document showed nothing but dark black pixels and no gray pixels. WHY?
If he was born in Hawaii then he lied all through college and committed fraud in obtaining assistance reserved for foreign students.
If he was born in Kenya like Kenya claims or most importantly, his very own Senatorial campaign claims of a Kenyan birthplace, then he should immediately removed from the White Hut in handcuffs.
You and your denier Saul Alinsky types will never be able to explain the over 20 edit layers in that PDF file SUPPLIED by the dark lord's own supporters nor can you possibly explain away his Senatorial campaign claiming his Keynan birthplace.
Tubledude, are you new to the internet? Headline News crawls? Drudge sirens? "Breaking News" sidebar?
Um, every new story is famous for 15 minutes in the 21st century, not just BO BC stories. fyi.