[philman_36]

Even if birtherism were right, there’s a more appropriate way to go about it than pretending every little bit of evidence that at best raises more questions than it answers is a slam dunk.
What then, in your opinion, is the "more appropriate way to go about it"?

And who claimed that this was a slam dunk?
A full glass eventually spills over the rim, doesn't it?

[Tublecane]

“What then, in your opinion, is the ‘more appropriate way to go about it’?”

Like I said, not to pretend everything’s a smoking gun, as you know birthers tend to do.

“And who claimed that this was a slam dunk?”

That my own verbiage. Okay, maybe they haven’t said “smoking gun” or “slam dunk” in every instance, but they are far too giddy and basically overplay every single hand. I may nto be able to prove it to you, but more than having been cowed by leftists that’s why most people write birthers off as conspiracy nuts.

“A full glass eventually spills over the rim, doesn’t it?”

Yes. But you have to be adding a liquid, not hot air.