Posted on 05/20/2012 7:31:52 PM PDT by xzins
Indeed. Without social conservatism, there is no fiscal conservatism.
Just remember there will be 1 or 2 nominations for SCOTUS in the next 4 years.Can you say: “Supreme Court Justice Eric Holder”?
Goode is a trivial irrelevancy, an insignificant rationalization of those unable to understand the American political method of coalitions consolidated into parties.
Simple answer: a Romney first term will almost certainly be much more conservative overall than an Obama second term would be and everyone knows this including you.
You are so filled with hatred for Romney it is causing you to tell incoherent lies. This will not produce the benefits for America that you somehow imagine it will.
You tell ugly lies. Goode has no chance and you know it. Stop lying about other people who just want to sanely and rationally and honestly help America.
Thank you for letting me laugh at you.
Goode has no chance and you know it.
Nothing great is ever accomplished by giving up.
Telling stupid, crazy lies accomplishes nothing ever.
My candidate, Goode, is the most Conservative candidate for president. I am voting for him. I urge others to vote for him as well.
In the spirit of Jim Robinson's truce, I will try to refrain from being like you. I will caution you however that you are not winning anybody over to supporting mitt by the manner with which you are attacking Conservatives.
You are utterly dishonest.
You accuse those who recognize the futility (at best) of Goode’s campaign of “buying into the fear”.
You claim that those who think defeating Obama will be better for America are not conservatives.
You talk of a “truce” but your talk is lies.
You hate Romney. Period. That is all you know. And you attack any and all who are not singularly focused on Romney-hatred like you.
Everything you say is crazy ugly lies.
I agree with that, depending on which people, of course.
You are wrong. Please abide by Jim Robinson's truce.
You accuse those who recognize the futility (at best) of Goode’s campaign of “buying into the fear”.
The argument you keep advancing is that if we support Goode we support the fraud, and that is not the case. Supporting Goode only supports Goode, denying both mitt and obama half a vote.
You claim that those who think defeating Obama will be better for America are not conservatives.
If you support Goode in defeating the fraud, then you are a Conservative. If you accept someone who is by any objective measure liberal as a replacement for obama, then I cannot call you a Conservative, no.
You talk of a “truce” but your talk is lies.
Why not take this opportunity to take the higher ground and be civil?
You hate Romney. Period.
What gave it away?
That is all you know.
Maybe, but I seem to get by in life. Enjoy the company of attractive ladies, play with guns, enjoy motor sports, run around the mountain raising hell. Go to church on Sunday and ask for forgiveness for same...Life is good.
And you attack any and all who are not singularly focused on Romney-hatred like you.
I've been more focused only on those who seem singularly focused on cheerleading for mitt. There are many FRiends here who are begrudgingly voting for mitt, and we agree to disagree. And I will keep pushing for Goode. Trying real hard right now to be civil and positive with you.
Everything you say is crazy ugly lies.
You really test my patience. Please reconsider and vote for Goode. He's the Conservative.
The Romney cabal dogs were out hunting yesterday too. Shrug it off and stand your ground. They are trying to run you away from FR. Don’t give in and, remember, you don’t have to reply when someone is baiting you into an argument.
You might have noticed that you spun instead of answering a simple question.
Romney will not be more conservative than Obama. In fact, there’s good reason to believe that he’d accomplish more for the liberal cause than Obama would, and especially if Obama were to be confronted with a republican congress.
I don’t hate Romney. I despise his politics.
It was Bush's fault he lost the election. NEVER accept blame for Clinton's election.
Daddy Bush a) sucked and b) was too cool for us and c) didn't take care of business.
So screw him, he lost. Perot lost. We lost. Only Bubba won anything, and he screwed that up.
RiNO's can go to hell.
If you believe the Senate is going to confirm that barfbag, I have got some choice land in Florida to sell you. It has a great view of Lake Okeechobee.
Here, FRiend, let me countersign that. Getting-it-exactly-right bump.
Any Senate that confirms Kagan is a danger, likely to confirm Holder.
This is not that Senate. That was the 2008 Senate. This is the 2010 Senate.
In the 2008 Senate the Dems had 57 Seats and 2 independents who caucused with them, giving them a total of 59, a near unstoppable number which with one cross-over Rino would have a filibuster-proof majority.
Rinos Richard Lugar, Lindsey Graham, Judd Gregg, Olympia Snowe, and Susan Collins all indicated support for her making a filibuster impossible. Even John Kyl said she should not be filibustered.
So that’s 6 of your vaunted Republicans, all of whom are bedmates of democrats, so one can reasonably expect the worst from them.
Isn’t that YOUR argument?
Of course, that is correct.
I voted for Perot, it was counted for Perot. My vote, and 19 million others for Perot allowed Bill Clinton to win with a minority of the popular vote.
In 2000 the 5% that voted for Nader allowed George W. Bush to win with a minority of the popular vote.
My point: Goode will not be the next president of the United States, you can throw your vote away if you want to. I hope you and all who join you are prepared for the unintended consequences.
I don't know about Gregg, but Snowe, Lugar, and Kyl will all be gone, hopefully to be replaced by codly men, and women of back.
The door closes on Communist nominees to SCOTUS in January.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.