To: who knows what evil?
I just read something on another thread...the 'queer' character may turn out to be Superman...the 'Earth-2' Superman; the 'Golden Age' Superman
Wasn't there a series many years back where the Earth-2 Superman married Lois Lane..."Mr. and Mrs. Superman"?
Pretty vile that they would take a character who was the first super-hero and the inspiration for countless more. Ignore that legacy and focus on what liberals think is really important...what he does with his privates in his bedroom. Siegel and Shuster would be appalled. Sales on the "New 52" must be worse than reported.
86 posted on
05/22/2012 7:16:34 AM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: LostInBayport
“Pretty vile that they would take a character who was the first super-hero and the inspiration for countless more. Ignore that legacy and focus on what liberals think is really important...what he does with his privates in his bedroom.”
###
Vile defines the queer agenda.
This is another attempt to mainstream homosexuality in the minds of kids.
I’m a bit surprised there aren’t more serious comments on this thread.
87 posted on
05/22/2012 7:21:21 AM PDT by
EyeGuy
(Armed, judgmental, fiscally responsible heterosexual.)
To: LostInBayport
To be fair; it is still speculation. But can you imagine looking back at all those great WW Two era Superman covers where patriotism just blared out at the reader, and now you find out that Superman is QUEER? If so...BAD idea. This is the influence of Hollywood’s Dan DiDio on DC Comics.
89 posted on
05/22/2012 7:28:10 AM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson