They release an “abstract” and BO decides to edit it. Would they have any way of proving his information was not provided by them?
Not sure about that. I was just surprised this has been handed off to the AG when the DOH should have been the one that should be taking care of this in a timely manner if there are no problems. The DOH has responded before, even if it was full of legalese, they responded. I just wonder what changed and why the AG is now involved. I’m only speculating that they may be now in self-protect mode with the AG involved.