The way I look at the situation, Hawaii adamantly refused to provide the original copy, microfilmed or not, but did verify correctness of the information that was on the Obama-released BC. I am not a lawyer, but it seems like that leaves HDOH individuals subject to charges related to fraud and perjury, assuming that you believe that Obama’s true nativity narrative excludes the possibility of Hawaiian birth.
ping
They refused to verify the correctness. They would only verify that those claims were on the record they have.
That’s why the form Ken submitted had to be withdrawn; it would have required them to verify the correctness.
And that’s why the special verification list was allowed to stand and be responded to: it only required them to verify that the claims were on the actual record they have - NOT the correctness of those claims. Onaka’s certifying statement makes clear that they are only verifying that those are the CLAIMS on the record.
However, Hawaii does still have to explain why Virginia Sunahara’s BC# is on Barack Obama’s record... I explained at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2885916/posts?page=241#241
(post 241) how they presumably edited the records for both Sunahara and Obama to pull that off at least once before.