Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Hatch Wooed Palin, and the Right
National Review ^ | 5/24/2012 | Robert Costa

Posted on 05/24/2012 10:32:26 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: mkjessup; All

From a purely strategic perspective, one can make a good argument that Palin’s endorsement is actualy a GOOD thing for Dan. Hatch had it in his pocket...he hoped that he could come out of the Utah GOP convention WITHOUT having to go through a primary...and I suspect Palin made him promise NOT to use it..the fact that it comes out now would suggest that Hatch is worried..have there been any polls lately?


41 posted on 05/24/2012 1:25:04 PM PDT by ken5050 (FRACK Obama!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
...where Hatch has frequently been an influential figure during contentious Supreme Court confirmations.

As fast as the last two breezed through confirmation was Hatch even there?

42 posted on 05/24/2012 1:51:24 PM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freddd

It’s still the greatest nation!


43 posted on 05/24/2012 1:58:21 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rurgan
Pretty picky aren't you people about a SINGLE act.

It ain't a "SINGLE" act Sparky.

See 'McCain, T' (T for Traitor), Arizona - Sarah Palin not only proclaimed that her vision for America was the same as John McCain's, she actually said that he was the 'Tea Party candidate' and turned her back on a REAL conservative, J.D. Hayworth. This isn't the first time Sarah lined up with a RINO, and it won't be the last.
44 posted on 05/24/2012 2:18:04 PM PDT by mkjessup (Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Hatch went up against Kennedy many times, most notably during the Clarence Thomas hearings. They remained friends in spite of their differences and I attribute that to Hatch’s ability to be true gentleman.

Yeah, a true gentleman who supported and voted for Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Now THAT's conservatism in action (snort).
45 posted on 05/24/2012 2:20:26 PM PDT by mkjessup (Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
There was a time when Senators believed president's should have the nominees they chose. If Hatch has a fault its that he served during the 40 years of the filibuster-proof, Democrat-controlled Congress when Republicans had no power and lost every fight. Those old timers still think presidents should have their choices.

You'd have more credibility if you didn't support such a HUGE loon for President (snort).

46 posted on 05/24/2012 2:38:05 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

“There’s no evidence whatsoever that the states are not investigating, prosecuting and punishing crimes triggered by bias and prejudice.

Even Attorney General Eric Holder has lauded the states’ efforts to punish hate crimes.” ~ Orrin Hatch

Sorry folks, but Orrin Hatch not only a pigfaced liar, he’s GOP-E+ and an ultra-RINO.

It’s way past high time for term limits on senators.

That’s what ANY discussion about Orrin Hatch should be about.

Bad move on Palin’s part, no matter how bendy, twisty, flaccid “TV” people try to spin it.


47 posted on 05/24/2012 2:38:17 PM PDT by wolficatZ ("We are no longer accepting comments on this article")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb; EternalVigilance
There was a time when Senators believed president's should have the nominees they chose. If Hatch has a fault its that he served during the 40 years of the filibuster-proof, Democrat-controlled Congress when Republicans had no power and lost every fight. Those old timers still think presidents should have their choices.

All the more reason to get that dead wood outta there.

You'd have more credibility if you didn't support such a HUGE loon for President (snort).

Tom Hoefling is a God fearing, America loving, Christian patriot and you ought to know better. So who are YOU supporting Deb?
48 posted on 05/24/2012 3:01:10 PM PDT by mkjessup (Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hattend
As fast as the last two breezed through confirmation was Hatch even there?

Of course he was. Unfortunately, so were Collins, Snowe, Gregg, Voinovich, Martinez, Lugar, Bond, Graham and Alexander.

49 posted on 05/24/2012 3:08:05 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Tea Party movement: more obstinate, unyielding and hostile to Democrats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
You make an effort to reach out to people that can help you win, treat them decently, stick up for them, build relationships with them, and they support you. In short, astute politician is astute. Gee. Imagine that.

This in particular really irritates me:

“Sarah Palin can do whatever she wants, but this doesn’t affect our race,” says Holly Richardson, Liljenquist’s campaign manager. “Endorsing Orrin Hatch is the antithesis of what she says she represents — breaking up the old guard and bringing change to Washington. But I guess they’re friends.”

First, Holly, I don’t believe for a second that that endorsement didn’t affect your campaign. If Palin had endorsed your boy instead of Hatch, that sure as hell would have affected your campaign. You guys would have been unable to shut up about it. And rightly so. Of course it affected your campaign when she went the other way. Lying in the first sentence of the statement does not really endear me to you or your candidate.

Second, what irritates me only slightly less than the lie, if not just as much, is your being a graceless, petulant c...ampaign drone about the endorsement. Just once, I’d like to see a campaign, when Palin endorses their opponent, say something like “Naturally, we’re disappointed. We think our guy, as the Tea Party guy, was the better choice for Sarah, but we understand our opponent has built a good relationship with her. And that’s okay. We hope to work with her in the future, but for now, we’re going to move forward with this campaign.” Which says a lot of the same stuff as you said without making you sound like a sore loser. I’m not a professional politico, I’ve honestly never even volunteered on a campaign, but I get this. And it drives me absolutely nuts that so many of the folks who draw paychecks for this do not. At least not when it comes to Palin.

Say what you like, Orrin Hatch is not stupid. He saw Bennett get beat for the nomination, he didn’t want that to happen to him, and he took steps to make sure it didn’t. He cultivated the Tea Party guys, he cultivated conservatives, and he cultivated Palin. And his supporting her and her family during the ugliness...considering how so much of the rest of the establishment has behaved toward her, that’s especially like water in the desert.

50 posted on 05/24/2012 3:10:15 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
Originally I was supporting Haley Barbour, but he dropped out and then I was for Bachman, Perry, Newt and finally, reluctantly, Mitt.

Please don't drag Tom over. I'm dealing with enough of FR's insanity today. He shows no sign of any of attributes you claim for him.

51 posted on 05/24/2012 3:15:27 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Deb, you would have more credibility, if your tagline wasn’t advocating violence and degrading behavior towards males. ;)


52 posted on 05/24/2012 3:21:58 PM PDT by mkjessup (Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; EternalVigilance
Joe Miller, Christine O'Donnell, Doug Hoffman, Sharron Angle are all examples of conservatives biting off more than they could chew. And they weren't running for POTUS. EV is a FReeper and I'm sure a good man. But C'Mon Man! POTUS?! Are you nuts?!

I mean, that would be as crazy as endorsing Allen Keyes for POTUS ... oh, wait ...

53 posted on 05/24/2012 3:28:43 PM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Tea Party movement: more obstinate, unyielding and hostile to Democrats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Well, you have a great point there. I’m trying to be a good girl. Really. Be patient with me.


54 posted on 05/24/2012 3:32:09 PM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

GOP nominee Joe Miller was a solid winner, what killed us there was the GOP Senate endorsing the independent over the GOP nominee, it undercut Miller’s ability to campaign.


55 posted on 05/24/2012 3:41:44 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross; EternalVigilance; stephenjohnbanker; Jim Robinson; humblegunner; Quix; ...
I'll say this: I would trust Tom Hoefling with America's future long before I would trust Mitt-Witt with it ('Mitt-Witt with it' - try saying THAT fast five times! lol) and I'm willing to bet there are any number of qualified and knowledgeable FReepers that could fill out the Cabinet of President Hoefling.

A few modest suggestions:

Secretary of the Treasury: my long standing FRiend, StephenJohnBanker, SJB would have our economy humming in NO time!

Secretary of State: Our Founder, Jim Robinson, because he is NOT a diplomat, he calls it the way it is, and he would be just the man to clean out that nest of vipers at State.

Ambassador to the United Nations: the one, the only, HUMBLEGUNNER! (why? because unleashing that wild man on the U.N. would be all it would take to drive those asshats OFF U.S. soil, GO GUNNER!)

Chairman of the Fed: SickOfLibs, who has a keen understanding of economics and combined with SJB, America's economic future would be secured.

Ambassador to the Vatican: QUIX!! Because there are just too few opportunities to instigate some highly entertaining events in world politics, and that would be one of them! ;) (just funnin' with you Brother Quix, you know I love ya man! ;)

Secretary of Energy: Landru, although I've not heard from FReeper Landru in years, his automotive and energy expertise would be just what we need to become not only energy sufficient, but HORSEPOWER SUPERIOR!

Well that's all the fun I can come up with right now, although I will close with the hope that I might be considered for Secretary of Defense, to be renamed the WAR Department, so I can actually BE the Secretary of War, which means that America would have but one policy dealing with our adversaries: we win, and they DIE!!!
(sooo, how am I doin'?)
56 posted on 05/24/2012 4:06:01 PM PDT by mkjessup (Eternal Vigilance (aka FReeper Tom Hoefling) has my vote for President in 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup; Servant of the Cross; EternalVigilance; stephenjohnbanker; Jim Robinson; humblegunner; ...

Eliminate the Dept. of Education
Eliminate the EPA
Eliminate the Dept. of Energy
Cut federal staffing in other agencies by at least 1/3rd
Slash the corporate tax rate, and endemic regulations.
Interstate competition on health insurance.

There’s a start.


57 posted on 05/25/2012 9:04:59 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ; mkjessup; All

” It’s way past high time for term limits on senators.”

THERE is the answer!!


58 posted on 05/25/2012 10:35:53 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

What you all say about Sarah Palin is totally insane.

What are you all democrats?


59 posted on 05/26/2012 6:29:18 AM PDT by rurgan (Sunset all laws at 4 years.China is destroying U.S. ability to manufacture,makes everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Deb
If Hatch has a fault its that he served during the 40 years of the filibuster-proof, Democrat-controlled Congress when Republicans had no power and lost every fight.

For the record, the only filibuster-proof Senate Hatch served in was his first, in 1977. It lasted two years.

60 posted on 05/26/2012 6:42:37 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Obama vs. Romney: Zero x Zero = Zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson