Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford

“”Western Christian civilization is superior to Islamic barbarism and we will defend our higher way of life against the forces of medievalism, female mutilation, and authoritarianism; it is Islam which must reform and not America and the West which must apologize or submit”?

Your summation reminded me of a bygone era. Different ideology, but really no different.

“We shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.”


33 posted on 05/26/2012 1:55:43 PM PDT by Owl558 ("Those who remember George Satayana are doomed to repeat him")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Owl558
“We shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty.”

It has become a commonplace to observe how far the Democrat party has evolved from the firmness of purpose expressed in Kennedy's inaugural address. The Obama administration is mired up to its genitals in the swamp of relativism seemingly capable only of vomiting up apology after apology out of its dismay over what we have done in the last half-century "to assure the survival and success of liberty."

Whether Kennedy read these words of his speech writer, Ted Sorensen, because he really believed them or because he was insecure and felt it was necessary to dress his new administration with an aura of square jawed purpose is not entirely clear to history. One can review Kennedy's performance at the Vienna summit with Khrushchev, his decision to go ahead with the Bay of Pigs but also his failure to support it, his performance under pressure during the Cuban missile crisis, and come to either conclusion. Kennedy was at the end of the day a politician but he was also an Irish-American patriot. The same could hardly be said of his brothers. Teddy even treacherously consorted with the KGB to gain the White House.

If one looks at the foreign policy of Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama it is difficult to see any coherent driving purpose except acceptance of the notion that the nation state is an evil institution and the American nation state is the most evil of those institutions because it stands athwart the march of socialism toward utopia obstructing progress.

In the shack-up of modern progressive neo-communism with Islamic jihad under Obama we see the inversion of Kennedy's words to the effect that we will support any enemy and subvert any ally to assist in the survival and success of statism and one world socialist government.

Ultimately, one is driven to believe that the ultimate rationalization moving the Obama administration is nothing more elevated than, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." The leftists which now inhabit not only the Oval Office but the State Department and the CIA are so purblind in their hatred of American exceptionalism that they will court Islamic terrorism in the homeland, believing in their arrogance that they will be able to triumph over Islam just as they will have defeated American capitalism. They will stand over the ruins of both.


35 posted on 05/27/2012 12:06:28 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson