[JoshuaLawrenceChamberlain]

Amen.. Come Quickly Lord Jesus.. Come quickly indeed.

Terrible terrible things are in store for this nation. And God’s Righteousness will be VERY just. I just pray he allows us believers to join Him before His wrath is poured out upon this wicked disgusting land.

Perhaps, that smelly piece of trash, jeremiah wright, was correct in his infamous quote

[j_tull]

Your link 404’s.

[MrEdd]

Hubris.

Radical Feminism gets its predictable reward as other parts of the leftist coalition grasp what their hearts desire with no regard for the feminazis.

And, if it really is a lump of tissue, then there couldn't be any foul, now could there? Every child a wanted child (rang the mantra) so if a woman wants a son...who is to complain.

I am for banning abortion outright.
I have zero intentions of allowing it to be tailored in such a way that the feminists will continue to support it.

I predict they are about to make an about face in their thinking.

[cripplecreek]

If only the republicans had control of the house......

[PapaNew]

Who agreed to this stupid “fast-track” process for this bill? Since the bill wouldn’t have survived Obama’s veto it needs to be slow-rolled until 2013 when Obama is replaced by Romney who at least says he’s against abortion.

[MacMattico]

What pieces of you know what. I have a daughter from China who is absolutely wonderful, and although abandoned at birth at least her birth mother was a better person then the U. S. House of Representatives (not all of them) that thought it ok if she would have just been aborted. Yes they needed a 2/3 rds vote, but it should have received a 100% vote banning gender selection. This should be a big campaign issue, talk about the ultimate war on women and girls!

[hattend]

Franks said Republicans haven’t ruled out bringing similar legislation before the House later under a procedure requiring a simple majority vote.

Good!

The vote was 246-168, short of the two-thirds majority needed under a fast-track procedure used by the House.

Why fast track it then? You have the votes to pass but then screw up the vote procedure?

[BillT]

and the war on women continues unabated by the Democrats!

[fortheDeclaration]

I think the GOP wanted to get those Democrat votes on the record to target them in the Fall.

Very good tactic.

[Abathar]

Does anyone know if any Republicans voted against this?

[Jeff Head]

The wording of this reveals the author’s bias. “House rejects Ban,” when in fact the House voted overwhelmingly for it.

But because of special rules on the way it was presented, they had to have a 66% majoriy in order to be able to ovr-ride a veto. The got 61% when they needed 66%.

The vote was 246-168 in favor of the Bill.

But that’s ok, the GOP controlled House did its job. They won by a large margin, even had some dems votre for it.

The GOP wanted to get people on record. They knew even if they had gotten the vote in under normal tracking and won (which they would have) that it would not survive the Senate (which would never bring it up for a vote under Reid) or Obama’s veto in any case.

But this way, by fast tracking it, they got the Dem Nays on record for everyone to see and you can bet the GOP and PACs will use this in November in every race where any Democrat voting Nay on it is up for election.

It’s actually a shrewd and smart move, IMHO, because the vote will come back to haunt the Dems badly.

AMERICA AT THE CROSSROADS OF HISTORY
http://www.jeffhead.com/crossroads.htm

[Monorprise]

Good ridden, Washington has no business saying one thing or the other on the matter of abortion. Abortion like all other forms of domestic killing/murder is a State issue.

Washington D.C. is too big, too slow, and too distant to make Representative domestic policy. It’s constitution does not permit such distant domestic government for a good reason.

[Monorprise]

Good ridden, Washington has no business saying one thing or the other on the matter of abortion. Abortion like all other forms of domestic killing/murder is a State issue.

Washington D.C. is too big, too slow, and too distant to make Representative domestic policy. It’s constitution does not permit such distant domestic government for a good reason.

[free_life]

Good this bill would have done nothing to prevent any abortion. We don’t need a Federal abortion agency that would have been the beginning of Federal Thought Police. How would they enforce such a law? We have read your mind and have concluded you hate women that is why you had the abortion...off to prison and reeducation.

Wake up O’sleepers only a bill that protects the right to life of the unborn has any real effect, this was a political do nothing bill.