Replies

BOTH Myth Romney and Barack Insane Obozo have long track records of moral complicity with the evil of abortion throughout all stages of pregnancy. See Romneycare (adopted a year AFTER Myth CLAIMED to have become "pro-life") which offered abortion at ANY stage of pregnancy for a mere $50, and Obozocare with the Sebelius regulations attached thereto.

Material cooperation with evil is, ummmm, EVIL and not permissible to Catholics. Russell Shaw is a well0respected writer and Our Sunday Visitor, while not an official organ of the Roman Catholic Church, is generally a fine publication. Nonetheless, I recognize no moral obligation to choose Romney because he has SO FAR not succumbed to cooperating with post-birth infanticide as Obozo has.

To make such distinctions is to jump to the top of the slippery slope voluntarily and slide on down is to trivialize 2000 years of Catholic heroism and martyrdom. BOTH Obozo and Romney are unabashed and enthusiastic babykillers. Additionally, BOTH Romney and Obozo are enthusiastic persecutors of the Roman Catholic Church (for reasons that would apply to any other pro-life and pro-family church as well).

I think it is safe to say that there are no foreseeable circumstances whatsoever under which Obozo is entitled to a single actually Catholic vote. However much many Catholics might prefer someone (Myth Romney) THEY might (probably wrongly) PERCEIVE as more trustworthy on matters of national defense, money, taxes, money, spending, money, education, money, culture, money, guns, money, energy, money, trust fund protection and promotion, and, ummmm, money, voting for an enthusiastic baby-killer and persecutor of the Roman Catholic Church or any other is NOT MORALLY permissible for any Catholic. It is material cooperation with the central major evil of our time and also with persecution of our Church.

If opposing any and all baby-killers and Church persecutors means that I am not answering some presumed "call" to vote for "the least harm" which means the alleged lesser of two evils, that will just have to be tooooo bad because I don't vote for babykillers and Church persecutors and you (and whoever might presume to make such a call) are going to find that those Catholics absolutely committed against baby-killing and Church persecution are no more likely to "convert" over to supporting Myth Romney than members of the WWII Resistance were likely to convert to the nazism of their era.

If Russell Shaw is willing to listen to this false siren song of the Massachusetts trashbag, then he has freedom to do so under civil law. I would not want to be standing in his shoes explaining such moral surrendermonkeyism to Jesus Christ at the threshold of the next life.

The reference to the Born Alive Act, an Illinois legislative proposal that resulted from one instance of a baby aborted alive at "Christ Hospital,"(no less) a Lutheran hospital, in which a baby aborted alive in a late term abortion was ordered to be exposed to death by the hospital "authorities" by being placed in a furnace room by a nurse. The nurse was Jill (?) Stanek, a reformed Christian who forfeited her job rather than cooperate. I think she works for Judy Brown at American Life League nowadays. Stanek is a moral heroine. So is Judy Brown. I am betting Judy Brown won't be endorsing the Massachusetts baby-killer for POTUS any more than she would endorse Adolph Eichmann or Dr. Mengele.

In the "Christ Hospital" case, the child may or may not have died. Truthfully, I do not know but, as a result of the awful publicity applied to the worse reality at "Christ Hospital," its owners changed hospital policy to prevent any repetition. The child's death (if that was the result) is, of course, of great moral significance. The purposeful policies of Roe vs. Wade and its progeny, and of opportunistic baby-killer politicians like Romney and Obozo are of greater moral significance for me as a Catholic and not just because of the number of victims and likelihood of mass repetition. No one asks me, as a Roman Catholic or even as an American, to choose the leaders of the hideously misnamed "Christ Hospital" to carry on or cancel a policy of acting as Dachau for many unborn innocents (do they perform abortions of the conventional sort in the name of our Savior???). I am asked to vote in November between and among, inter alia, Myth Romney and Obozo. I will be voting for Tom Hoefling. I owe him that vote as my reformed brother in Christ, as a never deviating protector of each and every life lovingly formed in the womb by God, as a near infinite moral superior of the likes of Romney and Obozo and because four years ago I foolishly argued here against his advocacy of third party politics when another pair of unacceptables were nominated by the major parties: McCain and Obozo.

I have voted Republican in every POTUS election from Nixon in 1968 to McCain in 2008. I have regretted many of those votes (Nixon I, Ford, Bush the Elder, Dole, McCain). That is it. From now until the day I die, I am voting Catholic. I won't vote for phony baby-killer "Catholics." I will gladly vote for any candidate who deserves and has earned my vote whether Catholic, reformed, Orthodox Jew, or of no faith whatsoever who can convince me that he/she has EARNED my vote. Sometimes that will mean voting third party as I will for Tom Hoefling. On rare occasions for a Democrat, sometimes not at all. If you or any Catholic want to compromise, you or they will be doing it without me.

If Myth Romney wants actually Catholic votes, he should be made to earn them. I don't expect to see Myth earn them any more than Obozo will. I will not worship Moloch or Baal in the form of either one of those candidates.

What's next? Two major party candidates who regard the decision to kill one's children born alive up to the age of 10 years of age as a matter of "privacy." The Democrat says that 10 years of age is not enough. He/she/it thinks 12 would be better. Are you suggesting that I have a moral obligation "as a Catholic" to vote for the Republican he/she/it who would cut off the killing at age 10??? I don't think so!