Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Head
His stance on the issues (taken by itself) is not bad...read them.

I did read them. And since he's the guy who publicly distanced himself from Reagan-Bush, defined himself as a progressive and who governed as a liberal, I simply don't believe him.

Romney will stand wherever he thinks he'll get the most votes. His actions speak louder than his words.

I agree we must have the House and Senate regardless of who is President and that is where my energy and money will go in this election cycle. But Romney is simply a bridge too far.

207 posted on 06/04/2012 10:21:22 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Colonel_Flagg
And I can understand you doubting him. But he is making huge political commitments and expending huge political captial with these endoresements to stand on these issues. He is toast if he renigs on them, and as a a pol, that is not what he will be inclinded to do.

OTOH, we have Obama who has no chance of supporting anything even close to those stances. To the contrary he will continue to take his "fundamental change" wrecking ball to the nation.

So, for me, on what I consider the excellent chance that Romney will have to keep those commitments, I will use him to defeat Obama who is clearly doing all in his power to deatroy us. While at the same time working with you to impact the House and Senate as we have indicated.

208 posted on 06/04/2012 10:27:12 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson