Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conscience of a Conservative
I don't like what? The guy lied to the court. Now, he's going to face the consequences of lying (probably in the form of a higher bond and an admonishment from the judge).

The Big Banks routinely lied to the courts about foreclosure documents. Where did you stand on that issue?

Jon Corzine is a criminal. How come he's not under arrest?

If "the courts" were on fire, I wouldn't relieve myself on them to put it out.

152 posted on 06/01/2012 9:17:42 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: kiryandil
Jon Corzine is a criminal. How come he's not under arrest?

O/T, but good question.

Bernie Madoff's "victims" are not victims in the same class with Corzine's victims. People who invested with Bernie knew or should have known that something was not right. In the case of Corzine, that's not true. That makes Governor Corzine a worse person than Madoff.

158 posted on 06/01/2012 11:15:13 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil
The Big Banks routinely lied to the courts about foreclosure documents. Where did you stand on that issue?

The people at the big banks (and the not-so-big banks) who falsified foreclosure documents should be charged with that (whether fraud, forgery, perjury - whatever particular statute applies), as should their supervisors and higher-ups who knew about and were complicit in the forgeries.

Jon Corzine is a criminal. How come he's not under arrest?

Agreed, he is a criminal. He's not under arrest because, with a few "show-trial" exceptions, the government typically views financial fraud as a "civil" rather than a "criminal" matter, and the SEC and other agencies take their sweet time "investigating" before they ever even consider facing charges. He should be under arrest, but he's not (and, unfortunately, probably never will be).

If "the courts" were on fire, I wouldn't relieve myself on them to put it out.

How did you feel about Bill Clinton's impeachment? Either lying to courts is bad, or it's not. I happen to think it is.

171 posted on 06/02/2012 5:33:49 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: kiryandil

In GA both Obama and his attorney showed contempt for the court after they ignored Judge Michael Malihi’s order to appear in court.

The response? Crickets. Right after the judge ruled Obama eligible to be on the ballot on the basis of ZERO - no - evidence. A sharia ruling based on “judge’s knowledge”, apparently.

Why no contempt charges? IIRC, the judge refused to certify the court record so it could go to another judge to have contempt charges decided.

And on the issue of Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot, the superior (cough) court ruled him eligible before their clerk even allowed the plaintiffs to file any motions. The case was literally decided before it was even filed.

That’s what we call a “show trial”. It’s supposed to not be done in this great, lawful, “equal protection” country we’ve got here. Then again, this country is under a foreign enemy combatant, and he has filled the position of Attorney General with a man whose sole job is to make sure that the judicial system DOESN’T administer justice.


192 posted on 06/02/2012 8:17:33 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson