Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Recall the Left Would Rather Forget
FrontPage Magazine ^ | June 6, 2012 | Arnold Ahlert

Posted on 06/06/2012 5:04:21 AM PDT by SJackson

- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -

A Recall the Left Would Rather Forget

Posted By Arnold Ahlert On June 6, 2012 @ 12:47 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 9 Comments

On Tuesday, Republican Governor Scott Walker handily defeated Democrat Tom Barrett, and Republican Lieutenant Governor Rebecca Kleefisch did the same against Democrat Mahlon Mitchell. Both triumphed by nine-point margins amidst heavy voter turnout. Thus, the first state that allowed collective bargaining for government employees beginning in 1959 has come full circle. Walker’s victory is a repudiation of government unions that have strained state budgets across the nation, and may mark the first step towards bringing the nation back to fiscal sanity.

Tuesday was not without drama. Democrats accused Walker proponents of cheating, contending that calls were being made telling people if they’d signed the recall, they didn’t need to vote. State Sen. Lena Taylor (D-Milwaukee) sent a letter to Government Accountability Board Director Kevin Kennedy requesting an investigation into “such persons that are committing election fraud and misdemeanor crimes by their individual or group communications.” On the other side, an alleged Michigan resident calling himself Mike phoned into WMAL’s The Chris Plante Show claiming that Michigan’s “Democrat Unions” had organized a convoy of 4 buses, filled with Michigan Democrats who intended to illegally vote for Tom Barrett. And according to Election Protection, a D.C.-based voters rights group, hundreds of voters called a hotline to complain about being asked for photo ID even though it wasn’t required for this election, and about difficulty voting due to a new 28-day residency requirement in the state.

The days immediately preceding the election were equally colorful. Bernadette Gillick, a University of Minnesota professor, accused Walker of fathering a love child with her college roommate, a woman called “Ruth” to protect her identity. Walker denied the allegation calling it “horrific” and “ridiculous.” More importantly, so did “Ruth” in a subsequent interview with the WCMC. “I can confirm that it was not Scott Walker who is my daughter’s father,” she said. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Online ”Watchdog” reporter Daniel Bice corroborated the denial, further noting that Ruth believes “Dr. Gillick is mixing up stories.” Bice also checked Wisconsin’s Consolidated Court Automation Programs (CCAP) and discovered “it has taken a family court suit involving Scott Alan Walker and mixed it up with the governor, Scott Kevin Walker.” Despite such an obvious debunking, the story remained posted on left-leaning blogs as the latest reason to oust the Governor.

In another telling development, the United States Department of Justice announced Monday that they would be monitoring election returns in the various locales around the country, including the city of Milwaukee, to ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Milwaukee is Wisconsin’s largest city and Democrats believed a large turnout in the city where Barrett beat Walker by almost 50 points in 2010 would be the key to an upset victory.

Many critics were skeptical regarding the DOJ’s seemingly newfound interest in protecting the integrity of the voting process. They cited U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s indifference to two New Black Panther Party members intimidating voters in Philadelphia in 2008, his lawsuits challenging voter ID requirements in Texas and South Carolina despite validation of voter ID by the U.S. Supreme Court, and DOJ’s latest attempt to prevent Florida from cleaning up their voter rolls.

But by mid-evening Tuesday, none of the gamesmanship mattered. The margin of Walker’s victory was large enough that any attempt to challenge it is doomed to fail.

Ironically, the election may have been the smaller part of a much bigger story. Government unions in Wisconsin have already experienced a precipitous membership fall off after the reforms Mr. Walker and the then-Republican-controlled legislature enacted went in effect. One union in particular, the Wisconsin branch of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) saw its membership decline by more than half, from 62,818 in March 2011, to 28,745 in February, according to a person who has viewed AFSCME’s figures. A small number of that decline was attributed to worker layoffs. Yet it is very likely that reform eliminating automatic dues collection was the critical factor here. And AFSCME was not alone: 6,000 of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) 17,000 Wisconsin members quit as well.

Thus, the long-standing idea that union bosses represent the interests of their members has been dealt a severe blow. It is a blow that has national implications as well. The hundreds of millions of dollars union leaders have spent on political campaigns are overwhelmingly amassed from mandatory dues collections. Dues that can no longer be taken for granted in Wisconsin–with more states likely to follow.

A de facto union monopoly was broken in Wisconsin as well. WEA Trust, a health insurance company created by the state’s largest teachers union in 1970, was routinely gouging its members for health insurance, because union contracts insisted that it provide insurance to most of the state’s school districts. Prior to reform, coverage for single-employees was $734 for schools with WEA Trust, and $614 for schools that contracted with other companies. Reform eliminated unions’ ability to advocate for WEA Trust, allowing schools to contract with other companies. As a result, WEA Trust has been forced to significantly lower its prices to remain competitive. The reduction allowed the Appleton school district to save $3 million per year. Since Wisconsin has hundreds of school districts, hundreds of millions of dollars in savings could eventually be realized. Add to the mix a $3 billion budget deficit that has been eliminated, a dropping unemployment rate now sitting below the national average, and lower property taxes, and it is clear the efforts of Scott Walker and state Republicans who were handed control in the 2010 election have made their mark.

The people of Wisconsin now seem to have validated those reforms as well, and the margin of victory for both Walker and Kleefisch exceeded even the most optimistic polling data in their favor. In addition, all four GOP Senators also facing recalls triumphed over their Democratic opponents — by large double-digit margins in each case. Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) beat Lori Compas (D-Fort Atkinson) in the 13th Senate District; Sen. Van Wanggaard (R-Racine) beat Sen. John Lehman (D-Racine) in the 21st Senate District; Sen. Terry Moulton (R-Chippewa Falls) beat Rep. Kristin Dexter (D-Eau Claire) in the 23rd Senate District; and Rep. Jerry Petrowski (R-Marathon) defeated Rep. Donna Seidel (D-Wausau) for Pam Galloway’s seat in the 29th Senate District. Galoway opted to quit rather than face a recall election. As a result, the state Senate remains evenly split 16-16.

It will be interesting to see if such a resounding victory at every level carries over to the presidential election in November. Barack Obama won the state handily in 2008. As of now, Wisconsin can no longer be taken for granted by Democrats. Neither can the long-standing and insidious practice of union campaign contributions going to politicians who kowtow to union demands in return.

In other words, for those Americans interested in limited and fiscally responsible government that represents the peoples’ interests, Wisconsin is a harbinger of many things to come.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.


Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com

URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/06/06/a-recall-the-left-would-rather-forget/

Copyright © 2009 FrontPage Magazine. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: wisconsinshowdown

1 posted on 06/06/2012 5:04:31 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
In other words, for those Americans interested in limited and fiscally responsible government that represents the peoples’ interests, Wisconsin is a harbinger of many things to come.


2 posted on 06/06/2012 5:13:30 AM PDT by ILS21R (John Locke: When the social contract is broken, the people must revolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Somebody needs to tell the University of Minnesota to tell Bernadette Gillick that her services are no longer required.


3 posted on 06/06/2012 5:15:47 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Journalists first; then lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
...and about difficulty voting due to a new 28-day residency requirement in the state.

I'm guessing this sentence means that people who "moved" to a Wisconsin hotel last week and who are not being allowed to vote today are calling up "a hotline" and reporting that they "are having difficulty voting."

Notice that the article doesn't mention any specifics about the "hotline."

4 posted on 06/06/2012 5:19:08 AM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

What was Walker’s margin of victory? I’ve looked online, but haven’t found it. Must be impressive for the ‘media’ to ignore it.


5 posted on 06/06/2012 5:19:27 AM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ILS21R
The changes instituted by Walker and the state legislature are relatively benign when juxtapose what must happen across the country. Public sector unions must be eliminated, a large percentage of public sector jobs must be eliminated. Entitlements curtailed terribly and subsidies must be eliminated.

I believe this was just the opening act for these thugs and things are going to get violent as we take back our country.

6 posted on 06/06/2012 5:21:26 AM PDT by BillGunn (Bill Gunn for Congress district one rep. Massachusetts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Islander7
What was Walker’s margin of victory? I’ve looked online, but haven’t found it. Must be impressive for the ‘media’ to ignore it.

Yes, I had the same question, and spent a while searching before finding it at the New York Times: Walker 53.2%, Barrett 46.3%.

7 posted on 06/06/2012 5:28:13 AM PDT by snowsislander (Please, America, no more dog-eating Kenyan cokeheads in the Oval Office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

7% I believe.


8 posted on 06/06/2012 5:41:17 AM PDT by SJackson (As a black man, you know, Barack could get shot going to the gas station, M Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“In addition, all four GOP Senators also facing recalls triumphed over their Democratic opponents — by large double-digit margins in each case.”

I just read a couple articles that said one of the RATS won a Senate race by 779 votes?


9 posted on 06/06/2012 5:53:44 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

The concerning issue is that it would appear they might have been able to “fraud” almost 7-10% of the vote....


10 posted on 06/06/2012 5:59:13 AM PDT by mo (If you understand, no explanation is needed. If you don't understand, no explanation is possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Thanks!


11 posted on 06/06/2012 6:04:13 AM PDT by Islander7 (There is no septic system so vile, so filthy, the left won't drink from to further their agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

What was Walker’s margin of victory? I’ve looked online,

I still haven’t seen any vote numbers. The media, and the unions, don’t want us to know how bad they got shafted by the voters of Wisconsin.

I did read that Milwaukee had a voter turn out of 117% of the registered voters. Union vote fraud action I believe.


12 posted on 06/06/2012 6:22:27 AM PDT by chainsaw (Sarah Palin is still my first choice to save the USA. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Years ago President Franklin Roosevelt called the idea of public sector unions "unthinkable and intolerable." Not long after, AFL-CIO President George Meany declared that it was "impossible to bargain collectively with the government." They were both speaking to the morality of public servants making demands on taxpayers' earnings under the threat of withholding public services -- or as FDR put it, "looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it." "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool." --Clinton presidential aide Paul Begala, July 1998

Public Service doesn't mean you're to be serviced by the public for life

President Kennedy’s Executive Order 10998, allowing Federal unions, is what opened the door for public sector unions at the state and local level, which is leading to bankruptcy from bloated public sector salaries, benefits, and retirement plans. Businesses that offered plans like many governments have would go bankrupt. Gov’t entities will, too, eventually, but it will be much more painful.

This is why unions should again be outlawed for public employees.

When collective bargaining was brought into American schools in the 1960s, it was a revenue stream and power base for Big Labor. Suddenly, union bosses became more interested in building political muscle than educating children.

At that point the battle between unions and school boards became more focused on salary, benefits, pensions and working conditions for adults, and less about students.

Kids are only pawns in the self-serving union game.

What is the purpose of teacher unions? To work for children? Establish new and better requirements? Push their members to better serve parents and children?

"Despite what some among us would like to believe, it is not because of our creative ideas. It is not because of the merit of our positions. It is not because we care about children. And it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power. And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions of dollars in dues each year because they believe that we are the unions that can most effectively represent them, the unions that can protect their rights and advance their interests as education employees" ...National Education Association's just-retired General Counsel Bob Chanin. (The NEA is the County and State Association's parent body).

NEA General Counsel Bob Chanin Says Farewell:

VIDEO

As legendary New York teachers union leader Albert Shanker said, "When school children start paying union dues, that's when I'll start representing the interests of school children."

All government unions should be banned. The idea that government workers need protection from guess who?? THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, is ridiculous. remember, teachers are government employees. Ban government unions.

.

13 posted on 06/06/2012 6:30:54 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

What was Walker’s margin of victory? I’ve looked online,

I still haven’t seen any vote numbers. The media, and the unions, don’t want us to know how bad they got shafted by the voters of Wisconsin.

I did read that Milwaukee had a voter turn out of 117% of the registered voters. Union vote fraud action I believe.


14 posted on 06/06/2012 6:35:01 AM PDT by chainsaw (Sarah Palin is still my first choice to save the USA. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Yes, 7%. Would have been even bigger save for a last-minute surge of suspect votes from Milwaukee and Madison (not unexpected)


15 posted on 06/06/2012 7:07:52 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Yes, 7%. Would have been even bigger save for a last-minute surge of suspect votes from Milwaukee and Madison (not unexpected)

I was lurking over at DU last night (and being thoroughly entertained) and it sounded like Wisconsin has same-day registration. The Unions were bringing in people by the busload and registering them on the spot.

And isn't a 7 point margin still 2 more points than Walker won in 2010? The voting shenanigans were totally obvious yesterday and the Dems still got their asses handed to them!

16 posted on 06/06/2012 7:34:18 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson