Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Balanced Approach: Tax like Bush, Spend like Clinton
American Thinker ^ | 06/07/2012 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 06/07/2012 6:33:33 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

OK, Democrats, you've convinced me. The last 8, 10, or 12 years (or whatever amount of time it takes to cover Bush's two terms and their aftermath) were just terrible, and we mustn't repeat or imitate such folly. Perhaps the example to follow would be that of another Democrat. Say, a Democrat president who followed a President Bush. A Democrat who entered office shortly after a financial crisis and a recession.

Bill Clinton succeeded George H.W. Bush. He was elected in 1992, or just after the 1990-91 recession ended and while the Savings & Loan bailout (Little TARP) was still in progress.

So what did President Clinton do? He cut spending (as a fraction of GDP). Yes, he did that even before Republicans took over Congress. And he took it below its 40-year average by his fourth year in office.



But look what Obama did. He did not "waste" a crisis like Clinton did. He took every ounce of George W. Bush's 2009 spending, added a $410-billion Omnibus and an $831-B stimulus, asked for the second helping of the $700-B TARP, and never looked back. The recession ended in June 2009, but the spending never stopped; it is still above the pre-2009 peacetime high.

In round numbers, we are spending about 4% of GDP, or about $600 B, every year above our pre-2009 post-war average. The new normal is a "stimulus" every single year.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; clinton; spending; taxes

1 posted on 06/07/2012 6:33:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

if people really want the prosperous 90s back then they should be clamoring for a President Gingrich.


2 posted on 06/07/2012 7:19:01 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“He cut spending (as a fraction of GDP)”

BULL****. GDP went UP so fast (because of Reaganomics) that government spending could not KEEP UP.

Don’t be a fool to think that Clinton was good in any way. Don’t be a stupid fool.


3 posted on 06/07/2012 7:24:19 AM PDT by chuck_the_tv_out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All well and good, but who will take the Newt Role and hold the line in Congress? Clinton gets credit for Congressional achievements? We have no Conservatives in leadership roles, and Boehner is falling flat. Not real impressed with Mitch McConnell either.


4 posted on 06/07/2012 7:33:12 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuck_the_tv_out
Government spending is part of the calculation for GDP.

We have been living a lie. We are using debt to run our economy.

5 posted on 06/07/2012 9:16:22 AM PDT by Theoria (Rush Limbaugh: Ron Paul sounds like an Islamic terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson