rules:
Michelle O’bama.
Didn’t that PBS Gwen whatever moderate a debate back in 2008?
rules:
What a pathetic list of choices.
I was going to nominate Sara Palin.
How about someone with big hooters?
Sorry to be so crude, but what are the next questions: When will we have our first Latino moderator? When will we have our first LBGT moderator? When will we have our first MLB player that has batted at least .300 facing left handed pitchers during regular season nighttime games?
Just put someone competent up there to ask relevant and unbiased questions.
I had looked for the selection "none of the above," "you've got to be kidding" or even "all of the above.". Now that could have been a fun choice watching a cat fight instead of a pretend fair & balanced debate.
Sarah Palin or Michelle Malkin. No RINOs, no liberals and definitely not Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer or any other liberal media hate-toward conservatives spewer. IMHO George Stephanoupolus took presidential debate hosting to the lowest level that could ever be achieved (working hand in hand with the WH in preparation for the “war on women” they thought was going to earn them brownie points with viewers. Instead it outed them for the lamestream media scum they are.
Salma Hayek, debates need boobs that are worth looking at.
There are no femail non-partisan reporters/journalists. The woman closest to “fairness” would be Camille Paglia. She might be too intellectual, though.
Michelle O’Bama’s mommy would be a nice choice.
Obama would say one that goes all the way down.
Roseanne Barr? I hear she’s politically neutral.
Dana Perino!
How about Barney Frank?
Good God, the MadCow is winning, with 38% of 504 votes. (no, I did not vote, but I peeked) LOL
Why not Sarah Palin?
The list is all liberals.
