[EternalVigilance]

No. It just means there are too many still playing the same old word games that you are, and putting their pet constitutional theories ahead of what is self-evidently true.

"Either life is always and in all circumstances sacred, or intrinsically of no account; it is inconceivable that it should be in some cases the one, and in some the other." -- Malcolm Muggeridge

[tacticalogic]

If we’re picking people to draw out of their own conscience and experience a ‘new’ Constitution, we should not look principally for good lawyers. We should look to people who agree with us. When we are in that mode, you realize we have rendered the Constitution useless. —Antonin Gregory Scalia, Supreme Court Justice