[tacticalogic]

That still doesn't explain how arguing that an amendment would be better constitutes a violation of the Ninth Amendment.

You've accused me of committing a crime, and I'd like an explanation.

[EternalVigilance]

You’re arguing that they are not a person, constitutionally, even though you admit that, biologically, they are in fact a person.

You argue that the unborn are not mentioned (even though they are), and that therefore their rights can be legitimately stripped from them.

The Ninth Amendment expressly forbids that.

It’s pretty simple.