Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Einstein Avenged: Neutrinos Bow to Light Speed Laws ("E=MC2, Dammit!")
TechNewsWorld ^ | 06/08/12 | Richard Adhikari

Posted on 06/08/2012 8:33:17 PM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
To: The Cajun
there their, it's late :^)
61 posted on 06/09/2012 1:48:43 AM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

o500 here, I am not cognizant to respond. Only, I wish to point out, the special theory of relativity is not the speed limit - it is a warning sign. “Beyond here there be dragond.”

See, if you go off into imaginary spsce, you are not coming back.

Imagine trying to find a thread, edge-on, somewhere between here and the moon.

Good luck with that.


62 posted on 06/09/2012 2:04:41 AM PDT by patton (DateDiff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: patton
See, if you go off into imaginary spsce, you are not coming back.

Hell, if scientist can imagine dimensions of space beyond our 3 spacial and 1 temporal, up to I believe 21, I can imagine a photon existing in 2 or less from its' standpoint. :^)

63 posted on 06/09/2012 2:13:21 AM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Well, there is a book title - “What does a photon think?”

Page one - “Nothing - it does not exist in time.”

Pages 2 thru 199 don’t exist.


64 posted on 06/09/2012 2:19:59 AM PDT by patton (DateDiff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun

Mysteriuosly, page 200 contains a single period, somewhat in the middle.


65 posted on 06/09/2012 2:24:07 AM PDT by patton (DateDiff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Or is there an alternate universe where the speed of light is the slowest a given particle can travel?


66 posted on 06/09/2012 2:25:48 AM PDT by Mom MD (T he country needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
the universe is infinite. Can you prove it is not?
Yes.
67 posted on 06/09/2012 4:16:07 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa
Does going to the sun count?

Only if you go at night.

68 posted on 06/09/2012 5:18:57 AM PDT by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Calling Doc Brown.


69 posted on 06/09/2012 5:20:35 AM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
A couple of things. First, the team who reported the results were as skeptical as anyone, and suggested that there might be some timing errors, but they were unable to find them. These are very very difficult measurements to make precisely, and these sorts of experiments push the state of the art in measurement technology. Neutrino's are very difficult to say much about because they don't interact very well with other things. Neutrino's pass through the entire earth without knowing it is there, with very occasional chance exceptions. Very sensitive detectors only count individual neutrinos a few at a time.

There is a self-consistent theory (quantum field theory), based upon special relativity, Maxwell's equations, and the dirac equation, and its scalar and vector equivalents, that establishes mathematical relationships between various things you can observe. They are mathematical formulae, however. Nothing explains "why" things behave this way. Why can particles never do better than approach the speed of light arbitrarily closely? Why do Maxwell's equations hold? The best theoretical physicist in the world knows know better than the man on the street. It is just so.

If one were to find exceptions then this whole mathematical structure would be a house of cards. But it is pretty well confirmed by observation, and now you can add another set of observations (neutrino velocities measured to high precition over long distances) to the mix.

70 posted on 06/09/2012 6:41:24 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The Guth concept of inflation (IIRC) posits space as a volume and only one variable expression of T. Why do Physicists not go back and think through how dimension Space and dimension Time 'evolved into the volume of Space we believe we perceive and the plane of Time we believe we perceive?

Imagine, if you will, a sort of Lotus flower, with a stem (linear Space), and axle where stem expands to form a bud (the planar manifestation or expression of all the linear expressions settling into a common rate of expansion), and a bloom or flower opening up (the volumetric variable expression of Space). In our frame of reference of 'now', we perceive dimension Space as a volume that is expanding. At the leading edge of this 'expansion' is planar space being pushed by linear Saptial expansion. Now do the same with dimension Time, since Time and Space seem inextricably interwoven. Our frame of reference for dimension Time is a planar present receiving liner past event effects. we extrapolate future temproal/spatial reality from a frame of reference we define as 'the present', the planar spatio-temporal location, like the 'leading surface' of the expanding universe. The connections are continuous between when the linear variables began expression and where they are now in unison (or not) forming the expanding 'planar edge of spatio-temporal reality.

71 posted on 06/09/2012 8:18:13 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The Guth concept of inflation (IIRC) posits space as a volume and only one variable expression of T. Why do Physicists not go back and think through how dimension Space and dimension Time 'evolved into the volume of Space we believe we perceive and the plane of Time we believe we perceive?

Imagine, if you will, a sort of Lotus flower, with a stem (linear Space), and axle where stem expands to form a bud (the planar manifestation or expression of all the linear expressions settling into a common rate of expansion), and a bloom or flower opening up (the volumetric variable expression of Space). In our frame of reference of 'now', we perceive dimension Space as a volume that is expanding. At the leading edge of this 'expansion' is planar space being pushed by linear Saptial expansion. Now do the same with dimension Time, since Time and Space seem inextricably interwoven. Our frame of reference for dimension Time is a planar present receiving liner past event effects. we extrapolate future temproal/spatial reality from a frame of reference we define as 'the present', the planar spatio-temporal location, like the 'leading surface' of the expanding universe. The connections are continuous between when the linear variables began expression and where they are now in unison (or not) forming the expanding 'planar edge' of spatio-temporal reality.

72 posted on 06/09/2012 8:18:27 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
Einstein Avenged: Neutrinos Bow to Light Speed Laws ("E=MC2, Dammit!")

Though, before the superluminal neutrinos, there were the superluminal photons.
73 posted on 06/09/2012 9:30:44 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PastorBooks
Think of where we’ll be in another hundred.

uh... we will all be dead.

74 posted on 06/09/2012 9:55:17 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Yes.

Now, can you prove it to anyone other than yourself?

75 posted on 06/09/2012 10:00:42 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Yes.


76 posted on 06/09/2012 10:03:10 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
but its one of the reasons they built the large hadron collider.

One of the 'other' reasons was so they could create 'black holes' that would swallow up all the COOL JOCK type guys, leaving all the cute chicks for the nerds.

77 posted on 06/09/2012 10:08:04 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun
With no time running for it (speed of light, time stopped thing), when it finally hits something, you can say from its' point of view it was both created and destroyed in the same instant.

So... what if it hits a flat piece of glass, or a mirror?

78 posted on 06/09/2012 10:12:07 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BigCinBigD
There are ways around everything.


79 posted on 06/09/2012 10:16:33 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: PastorBooks
One hundred years ago the Sopwith Camel biplane was still a few years away. Think of where we’ll be in another hundred.


80 posted on 06/09/2012 10:19:24 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson