Today, in part due to Obama, gays, lesbians and transvestites are openly celebrating their sexual orientation. History has shown such celebrations can be cut short if a totalitarian or other government unfriendly to homosexuals takes power. In retrospect, some things that happened in Germany in the prelude to Nazi Fascism are now manifesting in the United States, for example (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act appears almost a copy of the Nazi’s (Discriminatory Decrees) passed by the German Parliament and sign by Hitler on February 28, 1933 that suspended sections of the German Constitution that protected civil liberties. Under (NDAA) U.S. Government can deem any person or group a threat to national security; a terrorist, combatant or belligerent to order someone arrested and detained indefinitely without charges or trial. That might potentially include homosexuals should a future U.S. Government be unfriendly to gays or for political gain invoke NDAA to eliminate homosexuals.
Is he being blackmailed?
Deviate deceitful lunatics are in control.
Government has become evil to the core.
The pervert-in-chief strikes again. What a disgusting POS
The pervert-in-chief strikes again. What a disgusting POS
Isn't that special?
Homo history in America.. is being homo...in America.
So what flag will he be flying at the White House on June 14th?
NO! AS PROJECTILE VOMITING HAS BEGUN
Translation:
The gay/lesbian community has money.
I want it.
I already get a lot of it but I’ll proclaim a month and maybe get more.
I can’t believe that there are people who will vote for this guy.
So, more than likely lots of lesbian, gay, and bisexuals on Obama’s stuff (directly and indirectly), but how’s he doing with Transgender or Transvestite Pride?
Now, I’m thinking perhaps Janet Napolitano can be listed as a possibility, but is that it?
Someone notify the NYT that something need to be done about this oversight!
Who gives a shiite what he proclaims?
Voting against something is one thing. Voting FOR it is altogether different. People who vote for Romney may be voting against Obama, but they'll be voting FOR a guy who has been a steadfast friend of the gay agenda. As governer, he even proclaimed Gay Youth Pride and its outreach to schools.
I have a duty to vote -- I HAVE to vote; to refrain from voting would be dereliction of duty and a betrayal of patriotism.
It would be a betrayal of conservative philosophy to work toward making a confirmed amoral statist like Romney the most powerful Republican in America. It would be a betrayal as well to vote for Obama.
I will vote third party, wash my hands of favoring either statist, and pray that enough Americans join me so that when the dust is settled, nearly two thirds of Americans voted against the new president elected by a scant 38 or 40% plurality, making him pretty much the most despised politician in the country. All the conservatives I voted for down-ticket would do better battle against an enemy on the defensive, weak, and vulnerable.
Turns out that doing my duty instead of shirking it because I reject both authoritarian statist candidates, could result in giving the good guys the best edge that, under the circumstances, they could get.
D Day, June 6, 1944-— Obama is the first president to ignore it. It is good to know he was busy courting the Homosexuals and not wasting his time commemorating the invasion of Normandy to stop the Nazis.
Ready for ESPN to devote a whole month to this like they do Black History Month every February. At least a week of features on Billie Queen King.
What’s to celebrate? If man were meant to bugger other men, he wouldn’t have needed Vaseline for anal lubrication.