If they've introduced any doubt about Zimmerman's intentions into your mind, they already own you. You're lost.
You and your loved ones will "pale with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase...
“You’re listening to explanations by the same fork-tongues who told us that Bill Clinton, Charlie Rangel and Jon Corzine didn’t commit any crimes worth jail time.”
Actually, no, I’m drawing my own conclusions from the evidence provided in the arrest warrant. IF that evidence was fabricated—and I have seen no one offering evidence that is the case (or even making that claim)—then clearly I could be drawing the wrong conclusions. But if the evidence about the timing and amounts of transfers is correct, then I don’t see how a fair-minded person could conclude Mrs. Zimmerman was being truthful in her testimony.
As one simple example, why don’t YOU explain to me clearly and concisely why they made multiple transfers of just under $10K? Why not a single lump sum transfer of a larger amount? As the Fox News account of these transfers suggests (which is hardly a news source that ever claimed Clinton, Rangel or Corzine were innocent), it appears that the motivation may have been to evade the requirement that the credit union report these transfers to the IRS. And for Mrs. Zimmerman to claim only a day or so after these transfers that she didn’t know how much money was available from these Website donations certainly doesn’t sound like a truthful statement to me.