Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin); DuncanWaring
“....But the move would erode the unique Ranger ethos and culture—not to mention the program's rigorous physical requirements—harming its core mission of cultivating leaders willing to sacrifice everything for our nation.”

We agree we cannot and will not erode the unique Ranger ethos and culture.

We agree the rigorous physical requirements must remain in place.

We agree that the core mission of cultivating leaders willing to sacrifice everything for our nation must remain.

Am I correct in this?

442 posted on 06/16/2012 8:14:40 PM PDT by Chgogal (WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. TY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]


To: Chgogal

You are bringing a young girls naive, (but chipper) attitude to what is a very serious situation.

The reality is that females being present has weakened every thing they have been allowed into in the army.

Jump school is nothing like what it used to be according to the young guys attending it since females showed up.

Females could not pass Basic training, or Jump School, so they had to change what passing consisted of.

The same thing happened to civilian Police and Fireman in the 1970s and 1980s, you are probably too young to remember how one by one each city, each department, each state’s Highway patrol, and on and on had to lower their standards until females could pass.


444 posted on 06/16/2012 8:31:30 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson