To: Chgogal
The standards will not stay the same. There is far more interest in the political side than the “maintaining the capability” side, FRiend.
464 posted on
06/16/2012 10:27:20 PM PDT by
rlmorel
("The safest road to Hell is the gradual one." Screwtape (C.S. Lewis))
To: rlmorel; Chgogal
All of this is the left’s way of destroying the military, they used to fight it head on to try and shut it down, then they discovered that females and homosexuals on the inside was the way to turn it into just another massive government hole for social spending, useless to America, and no longer a bastion of conservatism.
In time real men will quit showing up and the females and homosexuals will have it, already the goal is to make it at least 50% female.
467 posted on
06/16/2012 10:52:45 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
To: rlmorel
“There is far more interest in the political side than the maintaining the capability side, FRiend.” Well, whose fault is that? The potentially eligible soldier or the cowardly Generals who will not stand up to the Nancy Pelosies of the world?
471 posted on
06/16/2012 11:25:37 PM PDT by
Chgogal
(WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. TY)
To: rlmorel
You raise a good point that cannot be ignored. The Perfumed Princes had better make sure the elite standards remain the same. They had better make sure that only the very best are eligible for Ranger School regardless of their gender. Finally, they better make sure that only the best qualified are awarded Ranger Qualified status.
If I were a General, I'd lay my life down for those standards. Otherwise, I would resign.
472 posted on
06/16/2012 11:35:23 PM PDT by
Chgogal
(WSJ, Coulter, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. TY)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson